ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2023
Model for the diffuse reflectance in spatial frequency domain imaging.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tutorial on methods for estimation of optical absorption and scattering properties of tissue.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Relevance and utility of theBiomedical optics express · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: In spatial frequency domain imaging (SDFI), tissue is illuminated with sinusoidal intensity patterns at different spatial frequencies. For low spatial frequencies, the reflectance is diffuse and a model derived by Cuccia et al. (doi 10.1117/1.3088140) is commonly used to extract optical properties. An improved model resulting in more accurate optical property extraction could lead to improved diagnostic algorithms. Aim: To develop a model that improves optical property extraction for the diffuse reflectance in SFDI compared to the model of Cuccia et al. Approach: We derive two analytical models for the diffuse reflectance, starting from the theoretical radial reflectance Results: The model based on the PCBC resulted in the lowest errors, improving median relative errors compared to the model of Cuccia et al. by 45% for the reflectance, 10% for the reduced scattering coefficient and 64% for the absorption coefficient. Conclusions: For the diffuse reflectance in SFDI, the model based on the PCBC provides more accurate results than the currently used model by Cuccia et al.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.