Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37035003›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

Sensory and environmental uncertainty in perceptual decision-making.

Merve Fritsch, Veith Weilnhammer, Paul Thiele, Andreas Heinz, Philipp Sterzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Merve FritschDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Veith WeilnhammerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Paul ThieleDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Andreas HeinzDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Philipp SterzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In perceptual decision-making, uncertainties regarding both noisy sensory information and changing environmental regularities must be considered. We aimed to clarify the relationship between these two sources of uncertainty using a combined motion discrimination and audiovisual reversal learning task with Bayesian modeling. As predicted, the influence of learned beliefs regarding audiovisual associations on perceptual decisions was greater under high sensory uncertainty. Critically, this modulatory effect was larger under high than low environmental uncertainty. Moreover, the degree to which observers relied on learned beliefs when making perceptual decisions depended on their individual tendency to change beliefs. While these findings suggest that weighting of the available sensory information against learned beliefs is modulated by their respective uncertainties, belief learning was not found to rely on sensory uncertainty. Unraveling of these interactive effects of sensory and environmental uncertainties in perception might aid in the understanding of aberrant perceptual inference in psychopathology such as schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesNeuroscienceSensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID37035003
PMCPMC10074201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.