Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37034843›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2023

Analysis of the annual changes in dental institutions that claimed dental sedatives in Korea and the types of sedatives using health care big data.

Minjae Lee, Seong In Chi, Hyuk Kim, Kwang-Suk Seo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minjae LeeDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3319-9754
Seong In ChiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Dankook University Sejong Dental Hospital, Sejong, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1282-8633
Hyuk KimDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3352-9536
Kwang-Suk SeoDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5906-0639
Seoul National University · KRSejong University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dentists make various efforts to reduce patients' anxiety and fear associated with dental treatment. Dental sedation is an advanced method that dentists can perform to reduce patients' anxiety and fear and provide effective dental treatment. However, dental sedation is different from general dental treatment and requires separate learning, and if done incorrectly, can lead to serious complications. Therefore, sedation is performed by a limited number of dentists who have received specific training. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of dentists who practice sedation and the main sedatives they use in the context of the Republic of Korea. Methods: We used the customized health information data provided by the Korean National Health Insurance. We investigated the number of dental hospitals or clinics that claimed insurance for eight main sedatives commonly used in dental sedation from January, 2007 to September, 2019 at the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. We also identified the changes in the number of dental medical institutions by region and year and analyzed the number and proportion of dental medical institutions prescribing each sedative. Results: In 2007, 302 dental hospitals prescribed sedatives, and the number increased to 613 in 2019. In 2007, approximately 2.18% of the total 13,796 dental institutions prescribed sedatives, increasing to 3.31% in 2019. In 2007, 168 institutions (55.6%) prescribed N Conclusion: While there is a critical limitation to the investigation of dental hospitals performing sedation using insurance claims data, namely exclusion of dental clinics providing non-insured treatments, we found that in 2019, approximately 3.31% of the dental clinics were practicing sedation and that N

Indexed as

Big DataClinicsDentistryHealthcare InsuranceNitrous OxideSedation

Identifiers

PMID37034843
PMCPMC10079767
OpenAlexW4362562487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.