Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37034638›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Transient loss and recovery of oral chemesthesis, taste and smell with COVID-19: a small case-control series.

Elisabeth M Weir, Cara Exten, Richard C Gerkin, Steven D Munger, John E Hayes

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabeth M WeirSensory Evaluation Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA 16802.
Cara ExtenRoss and Carol Nese College of Nursing, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA 16802.
Richard C GerkinSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ 85287.
Steven D MungerDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville FL, 32610.
John E HayesSensory Evaluation Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA 16802.

Funding

Rapid olfactory tools for telemedicine-friendly COVID-19 screening and surveillanceU01DC019573 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GERKIN, RICHARD C, HAYES, JOHN EDWARD · 2021 to 2021
$901k
CRCNS: Data Sharing: Pyrfume: A library for mammalian olfactory psychophysicsR01DC018455 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI GERKIN, RICHARD C · 2019 to 2021
$435k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018455NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC019573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anosmia is common with respiratory virus infections, but loss of taste or chemesthesis is rare. Reports of true taste loss with COVID-19 were viewed skeptically until confirmed by multiple studies. Nasal menthol thresholds are elevated in some with prior COVID-19 infections, but data on oral chemesthesis are lacking. Many patients recover quickly, but precise timing and synchrony of recovery are unclear. Here, we collected broad sensory measures over 28 days, recruiting adults (18-45 years) who were COVID-19 positive or recently exposed (close contacts per U.S. CDC criteria at the time of the study) in the first half of 2021. Participants received nose clips, red commercial jellybeans (Sour Cherry and Cinnamon), and scratch-n-sniff cards (ScentCheckPro). Among COVID-19 cases who entered the study on or before Day 10 of infection, Gaussian Process Regression showed odor identification and odor intensity (two distinct measures of function) each declined relative to controls (close contacts who never developed COVID-19), but effects were larger for intensity than identification. To assess changes during early onset, we identified four COVID-19 cases who enrolled on or prior to Day 1 of their illness â€" this allowed for visualization of baseline ratings, loss, and recovery of function over time. Four controls were matched for age, gender, and race. Variables included sourness and sweetness (Sour Cherry jellybeans), oral burn (Cinnamon jellybeans), mean orthonasal intensity of four odors (ScentCheckPro), and perceived nasal blockage. Data were plotted over 28 days, creating panel plots for the eight cases and controls. Controls exhibited stable ratings over time. By contrast, COVID-19 cases showed sharp deviations over time. No single pattern of taste loss or recovery was apparent, implying different taste qualities might recover at different rates. Oral burn was transiently reduced for some before recovering quickly, suggesting acute loss may be missed in data collected after acute illness ends. Changes in odor intensity or odor identification were not explained by nasal blockage. Collectively, intensive daily testing shows orthonasal smell, oral chemesthesis and taste were each altered by acute COVID-19 infection, and this disruption was dyssynchronous for different modalities, with variable loss and recovery rates across modalities and individuals.

Identifiers

PMID37034638
PMCPMC10081393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.