Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37034562›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2023

Obesity prevention across the US: A review of state-level policies from 2009 to 2019.

Lauren P Cleveland, Anna H Grummon, Elsa Konieczynski, Sally Mancini, Anjali Rao, Denise Simon, Jason P Block

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Does the southern health disadvantage extend to accelerated biological aging: evidence from the health and retirement study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren P ClevelandDepartment of Population Medicine Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute & Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3532-274X
Anna H GrummonDepartment of Population Medicine Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute & Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Elsa KonieczynskiDepartment of Population Medicine Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute & Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Sally ManciniRudd Center for Food Policy and Health University of Connecticut Hartford Connecticut USA.
Anjali RaoDepartment of Population Medicine Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute & Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Denise SimonDepartment of Population Medicine Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute & Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Jason P BlockDepartment of Population Medicine Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute & Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Harvard University · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Uniquely, state legislators may enact obesity prevention policies tailored to each state's needs and take diverse policy approaches to address obesity prevalence. The objective of this study was to identify and describe state-level obesity-related policies between 2009 and 2019. Methods: Using a database of legislation covering 2009-2019, researchers categorized obesity-related legislation by status (proposed/enacted), topic, and environment impacted. Researchers determined the number of policies proposed; enacted, by political party control; obesity prevalence, by states over time. Results: 3256 obesity-related policies were proposed among 50 states and Washington DC between 2009 and 2019. Collectively, 18% (593) of policies were enacted; California (96), New and Jersey (57) enacted the most. Across environment and topics, the most enacted policies categorized in school environment (226) and school nutrition (150) topic area. Most policies were proposed (496) and enacted (77) in 2011. On average, Democrat-controlled states had higher enactment rates than Republican-controlled states, as did states with lower (vs. higher) obesity prevalence. Conclusions: States have actively pursued obesity-related legislation across multiple topics and environments from 2009 to 2019, with mixed enactment rates. Evaluating the impact of these policies, alone and in combination, will be important to determine whether these state-level efforts reduce obesity.

Indexed as

health policynutritionobesity

Identifiers

PMID37034562
PMCPMC10073818
OpenAlexW4281721473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.