ReviewArchives of medical science : AMS2023
Clinical efficacy and safety of rituximab with membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis.
Review in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Obinutuzumab versus rituximab in refractory membranous nephropathy: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Systemic inflammation and B cell indices predict rituximab responses in membranous nephropathy.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy of membranous nephropathy: strategic evolution from CD20 monoclonal antibodies to future vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of a B-cell-driven rituximab regimen for the treatment of refractory idiopathic membranous nephropathy.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Newer B-cell and plasma-cell targeted treatments for rituximab-resistant patients with membranous nephropathy.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of ripertamab for treating primary membranous nephropathy among adults: a multicenter, retrospective, real-world study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
- A meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of obinuzumab for membranous nephropathy.Sage open chronic diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Membranous nephropathy (MN) is an organ-specific autoimmune disease, and its prevalence is increasing. B lymphocytes activated by T cells produce antibodies. CD19+/CD20+ plasma cells may contribute to autoantibody and alloantibody production. Rituximab has been effective in treating MN in many clinical trials. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of rituximab with MN. Material and methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov without language or publication date limitations. Studies were classified in high-risk, medium-risk and low-risk groups based on baseline proteinuria. Follow-up periods and different administrations of rituximab were also compared. Complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) were assessed to measure the efficacy of rituximab, and adverse effects were also extracted. Dichotomous data were expressed by the odds ratio (OR), and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used for the recruited studies. Results: Fourteen articles, including 17 studies, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR of overall PR and CR remission rate was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.53-0.63; Conclusions: Rituximab is safe and effective in MN and a promising alternative treatment. More randomized control trials and studies on the role of MN are expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.