ReviewRSC advances2023
An overview of atmospheric water harvesting methods, the inevitable path of the future in water supply.
Review in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Symbiotic heat sharing in MOF-based atmospheric water generators for battery thermal management and sorbent regeneration.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Solvent-free formation of a disulfide/sulfone polymer network for salt-driven atmospheric water harvesting.Materials chemistry frontiers · 2026Article
- Atmospheric Water Harvesting Through Polymer Hydrogel Sorbents: Materials Chemistry, Design Strategies, and Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Amine-Functionalized CAU-10-Based Electrospun Hygroscopic Membrane for Atmospheric Water Harvesting.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2026Article
- Unraveling Water Sorption in Single-Crystal MOFs: Insights from Spectroscopy and Modeling on the Role of Structure, Composition, and Guest Molecules.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Sulfonated, Disulfide-Bridged Polymer Networks for Atmospheric Water Harvesting.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Anisotropic water sliding radiative cooling emitter for atmospheric water harvesting.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Hierarchically MOF-Based Porous Monolith Composites for Atmospheric Water Harvesting.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Green Aerogels for Atmospheric Water Harvesting: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Review of Bio-Derived Materials and Pathways to 2035.Polymers · 2025Review
- Optimizing Mixtures of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Robust and Bespoke Passive Atmospheric Water Harvesting.ACS engineering Au · 2025Article
- Novel dual-network-structured hydrogel microspheres for efficient atmospheric water collection.RSC advances · 2025Article
- One Step Further: A Flexible Metal-Organic Framework that Functions as a Dual-Purpose Water Vapor Sorbent.ACS materials letters · 2025Article
- Mechanochemical Synthesis of MOF-303 and Its COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although science has made great strides in recent years, access to fresh water remains a major challenge for humanity due to water shortage for two-thirds of the world's population. Limited access to fresh water becomes more difficult due to the lack of natural resources of water. Many of these resources are also contaminated by human activities. Many attempts have been made to harvest water from the atmosphere, and condensation systems have received much attention. One of the challenges in generation systems is the high consumption energy of the cooling feed, despite the generation of large amounts of water from the atmosphere. As other airborne contaminants condense with water vapor, the water after harvesting needs to be treated, which adds to construction and maintenance costs. Also, the need for high relative humidity in condensation systems has led scientists to find ways of atmospheric water harvesting at low relative humidity and use renewable energy sources. Sorption systems can absorb atmospheric water without the need for an energy supply and spontaneously. Desiccants such as silica gel and zeolite, due to their high affinity for water, can absorb water vapor in the air through physical or physicochemical bonding, but all of these have slow adsorption kinetics. Therefore, it takes a long time for the water harvesting cycle or they are not able to absorb water at low relative humidity, and others need a lot of energy for the water desorption phase. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOF) are porous materials that, due to their special structure, are considered the most promising material for atmospheric water harvesting at low relative humidity. MOF-303 has been identified as the most efficient material to date and can harvest 0.7 liters of water per kilogram of MOF-303 at 10% RH and 27 °C. MOFs can harvest atmospheric water even in desert areas using only solar energy, and the water produced is drinkable and does not need to be treated. In this review, systems and methods of atmospheric water harvesting will be studied and compared and then the mechanism of adsorption and desorption in sorption systems will be discussed in detail.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.