ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
RETRACTED: Cardiovascular outcomes of ethyl eicosapentaenoic acid in diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular outcomes and coronary artery disease prevention secondary to icosapent ethyl: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Re: 'Cardiovascular outcomes of ethyl eicosapentaenoic acid in diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis'.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2022-11-17Concerns/Issues about Data · Unreliable Data · · date of retraction unknown, html page overwrite;
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aim to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis encompassing all studies to assess the efficacy of Vascepa in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in preventing or treating existing coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Digital databases were queried. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for the following outcomes: composite outcome, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Results: A total of 4 randomized control trials (33,092 patients; Vascepa n = 16586; Placebo n = 16506) were included in our analysis. The overall mean age was 64.3 years old (Vascepa = 64.3 years; Placebo = 64.3 years). The sample was 61.5% male (Vascepa = 60.8%; Placebo = 62.1%). In patients with DM, Vascepa was found to have no significant effect on the primary composite outcome (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.91-1.04, p > 0.05), all-cause mortality (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.90-1.03, p > 0.05), and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.74-1.10, p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis by Vascepa type and treatment type was similarly non-significant. Conclusion: Our study concluded that Vascepa did not affect cardiovascular outcomes in patients with DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.