Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37034234›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of hepatology2023

Adherence to guideline-directed hepatocellular carcinoma screening: A single-center US experience.

William W King, Raymond Richhart, Tyler Culpepper, Maneola Mota, Debdeep Banerjee, Media Ismael, Joydeep Chakraborty, Michael Ladna, Walid Khan, Nicole Ruiz and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Health disparities in cirrhosis care and liver transplantation.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

William W KingDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Raymond RichhartDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Tyler CulpepperDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Maneola MotaDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Debdeep BanerjeeDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Media IsmaelDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Joydeep ChakrabortyDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Michael LadnaDepartment of Hospital Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Walid KhanDepartment of Hospital Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Nicole RuizDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Jake WilsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Ellery AltshulerDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Virginia ClarkDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Roniel CabreraDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe American Association for the Study of Liver Disease recommends screening patients with cirrhosis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using imaging with or without alpha-fetoprotein every six months. Unfortunately, screening rates remain inadequate.

aimTo assess root causes of screening failure in a subspecialty hepatology clinic.

methodsThe authors identified patients with cirrhosis seen in a subspecialty hepatology clinic and determined whether they underwent appropriate screening, defined as two cross-sectional images between five and seven months apart. The authors characterized the primary driver of screening failure. Finally, other hepatologists were surveyed to determine provider perceptions of screening failure causes.

results1034 patients were identified with an average age of 61 years and a mean MELD of 8.1 ± 3.8. Hepatitis C virus was the most common cirrhosis etiology. 489 (47%) underwent appropriate screening. No demographic or clinical differences were detected between those who underwent appropriate screening and those who did not. The most common etiologies of screening failure, in descending order, were: radiology unable to schedule timely imaging, provider did not order imaging, patient canceled follow up appointment, appointments scheduled too far apart, lost to follow up, no-show to radiology appointment, and provider canceled appointment. Hepatologists surveyed believed the most common cause of screening failure was no-show to radiology.

conclusionRates of screening were poor even in a subspecialty hepatology clinic. Screening failure was mostly due to systemic factors such as radiology availability and time between hepatology appointments rather than individual error.

Indexed as

CirrhosisHealth maintenanceHepatocellular carcinomaHepatologyQuality improvementScreening

Identifiers

PMID37034234
PMCPMC10075011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.