ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
An in-silico approach leads to explore six genes as a molecular signatures of lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- KIF2C/MCAK a prognostic biomarker and its oncogenic potential in malignant progression, and prognosis of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis as biomarker.Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Integrative multiomic and immune profiling of lung adenocarcinoma: molecular landscapes, gene expression, and treatment response insights.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics Analysis and Experimental Validation of Lactylation Related Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
- MIS18A upregulation promotes cell viability, migration and tumor immune evasion in lung adenocarcinoma.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Identification of Prognostic Gene Signatures for Survival of Patients With Phaeochromocytoma, Paraganglioma, and Other Tumor Types.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to heterogenetic-specific nature of the available biomarkers, the incidence of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is on the rise worldwide. Previously reported LUAD-related hub genes were searched from the medical literature via literature mining and were processed to identify few top genes via degree method. Later, a comprehensive in silico methodology was applied on the selected real hub genes to identify their tumor driving, diagnostic, and prognostic roles in LUAD patients with divers clinicopathological variables. Out of total 145 extracted hub genes, six genes including CDC6, PBK, AURKA, KIF2C, OIP5, and PRC1 were identified as real hub genes. The expression analysis showed that all these genes were significantly up-regulated across LUAD samples of different clinicopathological variables. In addition, a variety of unique correlations among the expression and of real hub genes and some other parameters including promoter methylation status, overall survival (OS), genetic changes, tumor purity, and immune cell infiltration have also been explored in the present study. Moreover, via TFS-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network, one important TF (E2F1) and one important miRNAs (hsa-mir-34a-5p) that targeted all the real hub genes were also identified. Finally, a variety of drugs also predicted to be very useful in treating LUAD. The discovery of the real hub genes, TFS-miRNA-mRNA network, and chemotherapeutic drugs associated with LUAD provides new insights into underlying mechanisms and treatment of LUAD overcoming heterogeneity barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37034228PMC10077044W4363643599What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.