ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
Survival nomogram for osteosarcoma patients: SEER data retrospective analysis with external validation.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overall Survival and Prognostic Factors in Osteosarcoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from Taiwan.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Time-dependent evolution of osteosarcoma recurrence risk across clinical risk stratification and its prognostic value.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- The effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival outcomes and a nomogram for predicting overall survival in chondroblastic osteosarcoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- RSL3 promotes PARP1 apoptotic functions by distinct mechanisms during ferroptosis.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025Article
- Targeting metastasis in paediatric bone sarcomas.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Gene Expression Profiling and Phenotypic Characterization of Circulating Tumor Cells Derived from a Murine Osteosarcoma Model.Cancers · 2025Article
- Inhibition of mitochondrial OMA1 ameliorates osteosarcoma tumorigenesis.Cell death & disease · 2024Article
- Stratifying osteosarcoma patients using an epigenetic modification-related prognostic signature: implications for immunotherapy and chemotherapy selection.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a nomogram based on the clinicopathological factors affecting the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients to help clinicians predict the overall survival of osteosarcoma patients. A total of 1362 patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma were enrolled in this study, among which, 1081 cases were enrolled from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database as training group, while 281 patients from two Clinical Medicine Center database were used in validation group. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Nomogram predicting the 3- and 5-year overall survival probability was constructed and validated. Multiple validation methods, including calibration plots, consistency indices (C-index), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to validate the accuracy and the reliability of the prediction models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to validate the clinical application of the prediction model. Furthermore, all patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups based on their nomogram scores. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were applied to compare the difference in survival between the two groups. Predictors in the prediction model included age, sex, tumor size, primary site, grade, M stage, and surgery. Our results showed that the model displayed good prediction ability, and the calibration plots demonstrated great power both in the training and the validation groups. In the training group, C-index was 0.80, and the 3- and 5-year AUCs of the nomogram were 0.82 and 0.81, respectively. In the validation group, C-index was 0.79, and the 3- and 5-year AUCs of the nomogram were 0.85 and 0.83, respectively. Furthermore, DCA data indicated the potential clinical application of this model. Therefore, our prediction model could help clinicians evaluate prognoses, identify high-risk individuals, and provide individualized treatment recommendation for patients with osteosarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37034214PMC10077046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.