ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
Integration of clinical features and sociodemographic factors: a simplified prognostic model for patients with multiple myeloma based on a double-center retrospective analysis.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Which factors are associated with adverse prognosis in multiple myeloma patients after surgery? - preliminary establishment and validation of the nomogram.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram that combines clinical and sociodemographic factors of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). A total of 257 newly diagnosed patients with MM from two independent medical centers in China were included in this retrospective cohort study. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify independent risk factors and to construct the nomogram. The predictive ability of the nomogram was evaluated using the areas under the curve (AUCs) and calibration curves. K-fold cross-validation was employed for internal validation of the nomogram performance. Moreover, a stratification system to determine risk level was generated based on the nomogram. Hemoglobulin, creatinine, rurality, and marital status were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) and were incorporated into the nomogram for OS prediction. The prognostic nomogram showed good discrimination and accuracy, and its predictive capability was superior to the International Staging System. The AUC values predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS probabilities of the nomogram were 0.775, 0.755, and 0.754, respectively. Subsequently, patients were classified into high- and low-risk subgroups based on the median total points of the nomogram; this risk stratification clearly distinguished between high- and low-risk MM patients with significantly different clinical outcomes (median OS: 27 months vs. 84 months). We established a novel prognostic prediction model by comprehensively incorporating clinical and sociodemographic variables, which can effectively predict the survival outcomes in patients with MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37034202PMC10077056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.