ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Segmentation of incident lacunes during the course of ischemic cerebral small vessel diseases.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perivascular spaces, diffusion MRI markers and cognitive decline in cerebral small vessel disease.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025Article
- Prevalence of anxiety and depression following small subcortical ischemic stroke and their association with MRI-defined brain damage: The DHU-LAC cohort study.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lacunes represent key imaging markers of cerebral small vessel diseases (cSVDs). During their progression, incident lacunes are related to stroke manifestations and contribute to progressive cognitive and/or motor decline. Assessing new lesions has become crucial but remains time-consuming and error-prone, even for an expert. We, thus, sought to develop and validate an automatic segmentation method of incident lacunes in CADASIL caused by cysteine mutation in the EGFr domains of the NOTCH3 gene, a severe and progressive monogenic form of cSVD. Methods: Incident lacunes were identified based on difference maps of 3D T1-weighted MRIs obtained at the baseline and 2 years later. These maps were thresholded using clustering analysis and compared with results obtained by expert visual analysis, which is considered the gold standard approach. Results: The median number of lacunes at the baseline in 30 randomly selected patients was 7 (IQR = [2, 11]). The median number of incident lacunes was 2 (IQR = [0, 3]) using the automatic method (mean time-processing: 25 s/patient) and 0.5 (IQR = [0, 2]) using the standard visual approach (mean time-processing: 8 min/patient). The complementary analysis of segmentation results is enabled to quickly remove false positives detected in specific locations and to identify true incident lesions not previously detected by the standard analysis (2 min/case). A combined approach based on automatic segmentation of incident lacunes followed by quick corrections of false positives allowed to reach high individual sensitivity (median at 0.66, IQR = [0.21, 1.00]) and global specificity scores (0.80). Conclusion: The automatic segmentation of incident lacunes followed by quick corrections of false positives appears promising for properly and rapidly quantifying incident lacunes in large cohorts of cSVDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.