Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37034019›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2023

Extracorporeal blood purification strategies in sepsis and septic shock: An insight into recent advancements.

Yatin Mehta, Rajib Paul, Abdul Samad Ansari, Tanmay Banerjee, Serdar Gunaydin, Amir Ahmad Nassiri, Federico Pappalardo, Vedran Premužić, Prachee Sathe, Vinod Singh and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Regulation of histones in thromboinflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Damage-associated molecular patterns and coagulation.British journal of haematology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Retrospective evaluation of efficacy of CytoSorbWorld journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Yatin MehtaInstitute of Critical Care and Anesthesiology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram 12201, India.
Rajib PaulDepartment of Internal Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500033, India.
Abdul Samad AnsariDepartment of Critical Care, Nanavati Max Super Specialty Hospital, Mumbai 400065, India.
Tanmay BanerjeeDepartment of Internal Medicine & Critical Care, Medica Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Medica Superspecialty Hospital, Kolkata 700099, India.
Serdar GunaydinDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital Campus, Ankara 06933, Turkey.
Amir Ahmad NassiriDepartment of Nephrology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 19839-63113, Iran.
Federico PappalardoCardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria 15121, Italy.
Vedran PremužićDepartment of Nephrology, Clinical Hospital Zagreb, Clinic for internal diseases, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Prachee SatheDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, D.Y. Patil Medical College, Sant Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri Colony, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune 411018, India.
Vinod SinghDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Institute of critical care Medicine, Hospital Name - Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi 110001, India.
Emilio Rey VelaCardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit, Samaritan University Hospital, Bogotá 11, Colombia.
Ankara University · TRApollo Hospitals · INAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo · ITDr. Balabhai Nanavati Hospital · INDr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · INHospital Universitario de la Samaritana · COMedanta The Medicity · INNethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital · INShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRSir Ganga Ram Hospital · INUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite various therapies to treat sepsis, it is one of the leading causes of mortality in the intensive care unit patients globally. Knowledge about the pathophysiology of sepsis has sparked interest in extracorporeal therapies (ECT) which are intended to balance the dysregulation of the immune system by removing excessive levels of inflammatory mediators.

aimTo review recent data on the use of ECT in sepsis and to assess their effects on various inflammatory and clinical outcomes.

methodsIn this review, an extensive English literature search was conducted from the last two decades to identify the use of ECT in sepsis. A total of 68 articles from peer-reviewed and indexed journals were selected excluding publications with only abstracts.

resultsResults showed that ECT techniques such as high-volume hemofiltration, coupled plasma adsorption/filtration, resin or polymer adsorbers, and CytoSorb

conclusionClinical acceptance of ECT in sepsis and septic shock is currently still limited due to a lack of large random clinical trials. In addition to patient-tailored therapies, future research developments with therapies targeting the cellular level of the immune response are expected.

Indexed as

CytoSorb®Extracorporeal therapiesHemadsorbersInflammatory mediatorsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID37034019
PMCPMC10075046
OpenAlexW4323305093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.