Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37033784›Full record

ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2023

Treatment of Striae Distensae with Filler Injection: A Systematic Review.

Sahar Hasan Alsharif, Asail Saeed Alghamdi, Wareef Abdulkarim Alhumaidi, Omar Abdulaziz AlRobaish, Mohammad Hassan Al Hamoud, Asma Saleh Alruwaili, Ghaida B AlQefari, Rahaf Tayi Almutairi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in the Treatment of Striae Distensae.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Sahar Hasan Alsharif *Department of Dermatology, Ministry of Health, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Asail Saeed Alghamdi *Department of Medicine, Albaha University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4485-3107
Wareef Abdulkarim AlhumaidiDepartment of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Omar Abdulaziz AlRobaishDepartment of Dermatology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Hassan Al HamoudDepartment of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3250-3692
Asma Saleh AlruwailiDepartment of Medicine, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia.
Ghaida B AlQefariDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Rahaf Tayi AlmutairiDepartment of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al Ahsaa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5059-6656
Al Baha University · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Fahad Specialist Hospital · SAKing Faisal University · SAMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUNorthern Border University · SAQassim University · SATaif University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stretch marks, also known as striae cutis distensae (SD), are visible linear scars that occur in regions of dermal damage due to skin stretching. Stretch marks are not serious health issues, but they may have a major psychological effect on patients. Due to poor skin color improvement or prolonged skin atrophy, there is no standard treatment for SD. Fillers have been studied for their effectiveness in the treatment of SD. Objective: This systematic review aims to determine the efficacy of fillers on SD. Methods: This systematic review is reported following PRISMA guidance. We included all relevant articles published up to November 2022 in the following electronic databases: Science Direct, Midline, the Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. The initial search yielded 119, of which seven were included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The systematic review included a total of 184 female participants who were over the age of 18 years old. Three studies used jet volumetric remodeling (JVR) to inject HA pneumatically. One study injected polycaprolactone filler. One study used calcium hydroxylapatite, micro-needling, and ascorbic acid. MFU-V and CaHA were given in one study. One study delivered MFU-V using micro-focused ultrasound. All studies showed that it reduces SD with only mild, temporary side effects. More favor was given to combining CaHA and MFU-V, which had the fewest side effects compared to other dermal fillers. Conclusion: As monotherapy or combination therapy, injectable dermal fillers may treat SD with minimal adverse effects. We suggest that more RCTs look into injectable dermal filler to find out what is best for patients with SD and compare it to other treatment methods in terms of results, costs, and side effects to provide satisfactory practice and basic guideline interventions for these cases.

Indexed as

EfficacyFillersSDstriae distensae

Identifiers

PMID37033784
PMCPMC10078536
OpenAlexW4362451498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.