Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37033728›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Molecular identity crisis: environmental DNA metabarcoding meets traditional taxonomy-assessing biodiversity and freshwater mussel populations (Unionidae) in Alabama.

Laura L Hauck, Carla L Atkinson, Jessica A Homyack, Brooke E Penaluna, Clay Mangum, Ashley A Coble, Jami Nettles, Jamie E Thornton-Frost, Miranda J Fix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura L HauckPacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Carla L AtkinsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Jessica A HomyackWeyerhaeuser Company, Centralia, WA, USA.
Brooke E PenalunaPacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7215-770X
Clay MangumWeyerhaeuser Company, De Queen, AR, USA.
Ashley A CobleNational Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI), Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5821-5026
Jami NettlesWeyerhaeuser Company, Columbus, MS, USA.
Jamie E Thornton-FrostWeyerhaeuser Company, Seattle, WA, USA.
Miranda J FixWeyerhaeuser Company, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) to assess aquatic biodiversity is a growing field with great potential for monitoring and managing threatened species, like freshwater mussel (Unionidae) populations. Freshwater mussels are globally imperiled and serve essential roles in aquatic systems as a food source and as a natural water filter making their management essential for ecosystem health. Unfortunately, mussel populations are often understudied, and challenges exist to accurately and efficiently describe the full suite of species present. Multispecies eDNA approaches may also be more challenging where freshwater mussel populations are most diverse due to ongoing and significant taxonomic restructuring that has been further complicated by molecular phylogenies using mitochondrial genes. For this study, we developed a microfluidic metabarcoding array that targets a wide range of species, from invertebrates to fishes, with an emphasis on detecting unionid mussels known to be present in the Sipsey River, Alabama. We compared mussel species diversity across six sites with well-studied mussel assemblages using eDNA surveys and traditional quadrat surveys in 2016. We examined how factors such as mussel population density, biomass and location in the river substrate impacted our ability to detect certain species; and investigated unexpected eDNA detections through phylogenetic analysis. Our eDNA results for fish and mussel species were broadly consistent with the data from traditional electrofishing and quadrat-based field surveys, although both community eDNA and conventional sampling detected species unique to that method. Our phylogenetic analysis agreed with other studies that treat

Indexed as

BivalviaDNA, EnvironmentalUnionidaeAlabamaAnimalsBiodiversityDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcosystemFishesFresh WaterIdentity CrisisPhylogenyDNA, EnvironmentalBiodiversityeDNA metagenomicsFusonaiaMussel taxonomyPhylogeneticPleurobemaSipsey RiverUnionidae

Identifiers

PMID37033728
PMCPMC10078462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.