Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37033722›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Differences among domestic chicken breeds in tonic immobility responses as a measure of fearfulness.

Inga Tiemann, Senta Becker, Jocelyn Fournier, Daalkhaijav Damiran, Wolfgang Büscher, Sonja Hillemacher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Inga TiemannInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Senta BeckerInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jocelyn FournierDepartment of Animal & Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Daalkhaijav DamiranDepartment of Animal & Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Wolfgang BüscherInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sonja HillemacherInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University of Bonn · DEUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: One priority for animal welfare is for animals to experience less fear, especially during human contact. For domestic animals, breeds that are less fearful may provide genetic resources to develop strains with improved welfare due to lower susceptibility to fear. Genetic predispositions inherited in these breeds might reflect the large diversity of chicken breeds. The goal of the present study was to systematically test a diverse group of chicken breeds to search for breeds that experience less fear. Methods: Nineteen chicken breeds from commercial hybrid lines, native layer-type, meat-type and dual-purpose breeds, ornamental breeds as well as bantam breeds were tested in a standardized tonic immobility (TI) test. Chickens were manually restrained on their back, and the time to first head movement and first leg movement, the duration of TI, as well as the number of attempts needed to induce TI were measured. Results: The TI response differed among chicken breeds ( Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence for substantial variation of fearfulness among breeds. This variation could be linked to the intended use during the breed's specific history. Knowledge and quantitative measurement of these behavioural responses provide the opportunity to improve welfare through selection and future breeding.

Indexed as

ChickensImmobility Response, TonicAnimalsBreedingFearFemaleHead MovementsHumansAnimal genetic resourcesAnimal welfareChickenFearPoultryTonic immobility

Identifiers

PMID37033722
PMCPMC10081456
OpenAlexW4362559629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.