Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37033587›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan as a Diagnostic Tool for Giant Cell Arteritis.

Akshaya Ramachandran, Drashti Antala, Prasun Pudasainee, Sreelakshmi Panginikkod

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Short and Long [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akshaya RamachandranInternal Medicine, Ascension Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, USA.
Drashti AntalaInternal Medicine, Ascension Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, USA.
Prasun PudasaineeInternal Medicine, Ascension Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, USA.
Sreelakshmi PanginikkodRheumatology Immunology and Allergy, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, USA.
Tufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory vasculitis that typically affects the elderly, preferentially involving large and medium-sized arteries and can potentially cause irreversible loss of vision. Early diagnosis and treatment are necessary to prevent this dreaded complication. Temporal artery biopsy has been the gold standard test in diagnosing GCA, however, false negative results due to presence of skip lesions, restricted inflammation, and early initiation of steroids have limited its diagnostic significance. We report a case of a 67-year-old female with headache, blurry vision, posterior scalp tenderness, feeble left temporal artery pulse on a physical exam with normal inflammatory markers. Temporal artery biopsy showed disruption and reduplication of internal elastic lamina without any evidence of giant cells or inflammatory cells. Owing to high clinical suspicion, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) was further done which revealed mildly increased uptake in the thoracic aorta, consistent with a diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis.

Indexed as

fdg pet-ctgiant cell arteritis (gca)skip lesionssteroidstemporal artery biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37033587
PMCPMC10075144
OpenAlexW4323309306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.