Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37033469›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

Motif elucidation in ChIP-seq datasets with a knockout control.

Danielle Denisko, Coby Viner, Michael M Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danielle DeniskoDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-0026
Coby VinerPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-6991
Michael M HoffmanDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-1562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing is widely used to find transcription factor binding sites, but suffers from various sources of noise. Knocking out the target factor mitigates noise by acting as a negative control. Paired wild-type and knockout (KO) experiments can generate improved motifs but require optimal differential analysis. We introduce peaKO-a computational method to automatically optimize motif analyses with KO controls, which we compare to two other methods. PeaKO often improves elucidation of the target factor and highlights the benefits of KO controls, which far outperform input controls. Availability and implementation: PeaKO is freely available at https://peako.hoffmanlab.org. Contact: michael.hoffman@utoronto.ca.

Identifiers

PMID37033469
PMCPMC10074035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.