ArticleArXiv2023
Denoising Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Data Using Stacked Autoencoder for Improving Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speed of MRS.
Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) enables non-invasive detection and measurement of biochemicals and metabolites. However, MRS has low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) when concentrations of metabolites are in the range of the million molars. Standard approach of using a high number of signal averaging (NSA) to achieve sufficient NSR comes at the cost of a long acquisition time. PURPOSE: We propose to use deep-learning approaches to denoise MRS data without increasing the NSA.
methodsThe study was conducted using data collected from the brain spectroscopy phantom and human subjects. We utilized a stack auto-encoder (SAE) network to train deep learning models for denoising low NSA data (NSA = 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16) randomly truncated from high SNR data collected with high NSA (NSA=192) which were also used to obtain the ground truth. We applied both self-supervised and fully-supervised training approaches and compared their performance of denoising low NSA data based on improved SNRs.
resultsWith the SAE model, the SNR of low NSA data (NSA = 1) obtained from the phantom increased by 22.8% and the MSE decreased by 47.3%. For low NSA images of the human parietal and temporal lobes, the SNR increased by 43.8% and the MSE decreased by 68.8%. In all cases, the chemical shift of NAA in the denoised spectra closely matched with the high SNR spectra, suggesting no distortion to the spectra from denoising. Furthermore, the denoising performance of the SAE model was more effective in denoising spectra with higher noise levels.
conclusionsThe reported SAE denoising method is a model-free approach to enhance the SNR of low NSA MRS data. With the denoising capability, it is possible to acquire MRS data with a few NSA, resulting in shorter scan times while maintaining adequate spectroscopic information for detecting and quantifying the metabolites of interest.
Identifiers
37033456PMC10081356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.