ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Co-designing an Integrated Health and Social Care Hub With and for Families Experiencing Adversity.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring co-design: a systematic review of concepts, processes, models, and frameworks used in public health research.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Growing CAPITOL 4 Life: A Case Study of Co-designed Material for the First 1000 Days Using a Modified Double Diamond Approach.Maternal and child health journal · 2026Article
- Seeing both sides of the story: creating patient/provider persona dyads for use in mental health service co-design.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- OveRcoming Adverse ChiLdhood Experiences (ORACLE): A Mixed Methods Intervention Co-design Study to Improve Outcomes for Children and Young People Experiencing or at Risk of Adversity.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2026Article
- Transforming Caring for Dependent Older People: A New Approach for Integrated Socio-Healthcare.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
- The use of personas to involve consumers in healthcare co-design: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Embedding Technology-Assisted Parenting Interventions in Real-World Settings to Empower Parents of Children With Adverse Childhood Experiences: Co-Design Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Opening Pandora's box - key facilitators of practice change in detecting and responding to childhood adversity - a practitioner perspective.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Moving from idea to reality: The barriers and enablers to implementing Child and Family Hubs policy into practice in NSW, Australia.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Co-design workshops with families experiencing multiple and interacting adversities including parental mental health, substance use, domestic violence, and poverty: intervention principles and insights from mothers, fathers, and young people.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Health Justice Partnership: An Opportunity to Respond to Childhood Adversity.International journal of integrated careArticle
- Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Wellbeing Coordination Program in an Integrated Health and Social Care Hub: A Mixed Methods Study.International journal of integrated careArticle
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of an Integrated Health and Social Care Child and Family Hub - a Case Study.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Integrated care research often fails to adequately describe co-design methods. This article outlines the process, principles and tools to co-design an integrated health and social care Hub for families experiencing adversity. Research methods: The Child and Family Hub was co-designed in four stages: (1) partnership building and stakeholder engagement, (2) formative research, (3) persona development and (4) co-design workshops and consultations. Local families, community members and intersectoral practitioners were engaged at each stage. The co-design workshops employed a human-centred design process and were evaluated using the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PEET). Results: 121 family participants and 80 practitioners were engaged in the Hub's co-design. The PEET highlighted the co-design team's satisfaction achieved by community members working alongside practitioners to generate mutual learning. Resourcing was a key challenge. Discussion: Human-centred design offered a systematic process and tools for integrating formative evidence with lived and professional experience in the Hub's co-design. Applying community engagement principles meant that a diverse range of stakeholders were engaged across all stages of the project which built trust in and local ownership of the Hub model. Conclusion: Co-design research with families experiencing adversity should attend to language, engagement methods, team composition and resourcing decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.