Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37033304›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2023

Rapid detection of sunset yellow adulteration in tea powder with variable selection coupled to machine learning tools using spectral data.

Rani Amsaraj, Sarma Mutturi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rani AmsarajMicrobiology and Fermentation Technology Department, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka India.
Sarma MutturiAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3251-8643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study sunset yellow (SY), a synthetic colour, which is a common adulterant in tea powders has been analysed using FT-IR spectral data coupled to machine learning tools for efficient classification and quantification of the SY adulteration. Earlier established real coded genetic algorithm (RCGA) was used as variable selection method to predict the key fingerprints of SY in the FT-IR spectra. Here, RCGA was used to select 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 characteristic wavenumbers for SY. Classification was carried using support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) classifiers. SVM classifier using 50 variables could give an accuracy of 0.90 amongst the three. Quantification of SY based on PLS (partial least squares), LS-SVM (least squares-SVM), RF and XGBoost were built on characteristic wavenumbers. Both RF and LS-SVM models were observed to be superior to PLS when coupled to RCGA obtained 20 fingerprint variables. Overall, RCGA-LS-SVM model resulted in lowest RMSECV (0.1956) with regression co-efficient values R Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-023-05694-3.

Indexed as

LS-SVMRCGARFSunset yellowTea-adulterationXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID37033304
PMCPMC10076470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.