Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37033303›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science and technology2023

Regulatory landscape of risk assessment of pesticide residues in processed foods in India: a perspective.

M Muralidhara, S Mithyantha, T P Rajendran, Kaushik Banerjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M MuralidharaCSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, B-24, Mallige road, J block, Kuvempunagar, Mysore, 570023 India.
S MithyanthaR&D, Rallis Research Centre, Bangalore, India.
T P RajendranIndia Habitat Centre, Research Information System for Developing Countries, RIS Block IV, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, 110003 India.
Kaushik BanerjeeNational Reference Laboratory, ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, 412307 India.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-2370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In India, the levels of pesticide residues in Raw Agricultural Commodities (RAC) are being subjected to adequate legal regulations, and the health-risks associated with them are determined from time to time adhering to global standards. Since RACs are generally consumed by humans as the processed foods (PF), it is imperative to monitor the levels of pesticide residues in them in order to approach a realistic analysis of dietary exposure and concomitant health risk assessment. In India, production and consumption of PFs have a rising trend and hence it is indispensable to monitor the residue levels of pesticides in largely consumed PFs. Depending on the processing methods and physicochemical properties of pesticides, the residue levels may decrease or increase in a PF when compared to the corresponding RAC. While obtaining data on processing factors (Pf), it is pragmatic to focus on those situations in which the residues get concentrated following the processing step. Currently, regulatory agencies of several countries and the CODEX have determined the levels of pesticide residues in processed agriculture commodities, arrived at the Pfs, and fixed the maximum residue levels. Since consumption of PFs in India has tremendously increased in recent times and there is paucity of data about their health risks/benefits, it is imminent to deliberate on the complexities associated with the issues of adopting the Pfs generated by other regulatory agencies and subsequently examine the possibilities of generating the required data on Pfs on a priority basis to enable a comprehensive risk assessment.

Indexed as

MRLPesticide residuesProcessed foodsProcessing factorProcessing operationsRaw agricultural commodityRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID37033303
PMCPMC10076483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.