ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Development and validation of the patient reported outcomes questionnaire of children with asthma in China: A Caregiver's proxy-reported measure.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and preliminary evaluation of Chinese Vitiligo Quality of Life Scale (CVQLS).Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research on asthma control levels and quality of life is essential for children with asthma during their growth stage. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a questionnaire that can be used for monitoring and evaluating the disease control effectiveness and quality of life of children with asthma in China and to conduct a preliminary evaluation for its reliability, validity, and discriminative ability. Methods: The questionnaire was created through a literature review and qualitative interviews for a targeted population. Based on the previous work, 30 caregivers of children with asthma and 5 experienced pediatricians reviewed and discussed a collection of items. Then, 72 items were screened and selected to form the draft questionnaire. After three rounds of investigation (with 240, 503, and 360 participants, respectively), the final questionnaire was established according to the evaluation results. The structure of the questionnaire was explored through confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis and variability analysis were applied based on the first two rounds of investigation. Reliability, construct validity, and discriminative ability were evaluated based on the third round of investigation. Results: The questionnaire contains 6 dimensions and 34 items, and the total cumulative variance contribution rate was 54.96%; Cronbach's Conclusion: The questionnaire appeared to have good reliability, construct validity, and discriminative ability in children with asthma in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.