ArticleGenetics research2023
Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis to Screen Hub Gene Signatures for Fetal Growth Restriction.
Article in Genetics research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effect of Pomegranate Juice and Sildenafil on Intrauterine Growth Retardation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2025Article
- Clostridium difficile-derived membrane vesicles promote fetal growth restriction via inhibiting trophoblast motility through PPARγ/RXRα/ANGPTL4 axis.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is the impairment of the biological growth potential of the fetus and often leads to adverse pregnancy outcomes. The molecular mechanisms for the development of FGR, however, are still unclear. The purpose of this study is to identify critical genes associated with FGR through an integrated bioinformatics approach and explore the potential pathogenesis of FGR. Methods: We downloaded FGR-related gene microarray data, used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks to screen hub genes. The GSE24129 gene set was used for validation of critical gene expression levels and diagnostic capabilities. Results: A weighted gene co-expression network was constructed, and 5000 genes were divided into 12 modules. Of these modules, the blue module showed the closest relationship with FGR. Taking the intersection of the DEGs and genes in the blue module as pivotal genes, 277 genes were identified, and 20 crucial genes were screened from the PPI network. The GSE24129 gene set verified the expression of 20 genes, and CXCL9, CXCR3, and ITGAX genes were identified as actual pivotal genes. The expression levels of CXCL9, CXCR3, and ITGAX were increased in both the training and validation sets, and ROC curve validation revealed that these three pivotal genes had a significant diagnostic ability for FGR. Single-gene GSEA results showed that all three core genes activated "hematopoietic cell lineage" and "cell adhesion molecules" and inhibited the "cGMP-PKG signaling pathway" in the development of FGR. CXCL9, CXCR3, and ITGAX may therefore be closely associated with the development of FGR and may serve as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of FGR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.