Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37033097›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2022

Creating a Career Path for Shared Research Resources Personnel.

Luellen Fletcher, Christina A Harrington, Aaron Nilsen, Stefanie Kaech Petrie, Andrew I Chitty

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luellen FletcherPerelman School of Medicine Path BioResource University of Pennsylvania M163 John Morgan Bldg., 3620 Hamilton WalkPhiladelphiaPennsylvania19104 USA.
Christina A HarringtonUniversity Shared Resources and Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health & Science University 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park RoadPortlandOregon97239 USA.
Aaron NilsenUniversity Shared Resources Oregon Health & Science University 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park RoadPortlandOregon97239USA.
Stefanie Kaech PetrieUniversity Shared Resources Knight Cancer Institute Jungers Center for Neuroscience Research Department of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University 3215 SW Pavilion LoopPortlandOregon97239 USA.
Andrew I ChittyUniversity Shared Resources Oregon Health & Science University 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park RoadPortlandOregon97239USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared research resources are essential to academic research. A rapidly evolving workforce within a highly competitive market is making recruitment and retention of knowledgeable and technically skilled core staff more difficult. The inability to recruit and retain staff diminishes the resource's overall ability to provide services, which in turn affects academic research quality. Research institutions need to recognize that the roles and skills of shared research resource staff are distinguishable from those of research staff in funded investigator laboratories, and in doing so, develop a career path for shared research resource staff that will help these facilities recruit, train, and retain them. This brief focuses on the creation of a standardized career track for shared research resource staff: a career path of at least 3 to 5 tiered positions with task outlines that can be tailored to positions needed in any shared research resource. Salaries will vary for individuals within each position classification based on experience, mastered competencies, and time within the shared research resource. Besides characterizing basic task differences between shared research resource staff and other research personnel, the most compelling reason for having a well-delineated career path for shared research resource staff is to establish fairness, equity, and true opportunity in a supportive working environment, where shared research resource staff are motivated by developing a marketable skill set, gaining professional self-confidence, and earning a meaningful salary. Presented here is a case study from Oregon Health & Science University of the creation of a career path for shared research resource staff.

Indexed as

Research PersonnelHumansOregonABRFcareer pathcore facilitycore staffCOVID-19recruitment and retentionshared research resourceSRR

Identifiers

PMID37033097
PMCPMC10078831
OpenAlexW4320170172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.