Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37033072›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Evaluation of COVID-19 pandemic management in Türkiye.

Umit Kartoglu, Kayihan Pala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Umit KartogluExtensio et Progressio, Collonge-Bellerive, Switzerland.
Kayihan PalaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three years since the first cases were identified and 2 years since an effective vaccine was developed, COVID-19 continues to claim lives and impact people's health and wellbeing, both socially and economically. While the world has been waiting for its leaders to come together to form a collective response to end the pandemic, we still have not seen a multisectoral response, nor any whole-of-society approach. Like many other countries around the globe, Türkiye was caught unprepared by the pandemic. This was exacerbated by the unsuccessful management of the pandemic by the authorities. The reasoning and/or scientific explanations for enforcing or lifting public health measures have never shared with the public. Throughout the pandemic, no epidemiological details have been released on cases and deaths, other than the numbers of these two measures. Civil society organizations, professional associations, and the public in general have been kept out from policy formulation and decision making. As a result, community engagement has never been properly put into practice. In this paper, we analyzed Türkiye's pandemic management response through the continuum of the response cycle to emergencies: prevention, preparedness, readiness, response, and recovery.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsPolicyProblem SolvingPublic HealthCOVID-19pandemic managementpreparednesspreventionreadinessrecoveryresilienceresponse

Identifiers

PMID37033072
PMCPMC10076733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.