Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37032893›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

An ensemble method for prediction of phage-based therapy against bacterial infections.

Suchet Aggarwal, Anjali Dhall, Sumeet Patiyal, Shubham Choudhury, Akanksha Arora, Gajendra P S Raghava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Genomic landscape of 340 virulent Acinetobacter bacteriophages reveals anti-CRISPR-enriched candidates for therapeutic prioritization.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. NRG-P0074 Viral Sample RU1 from UnclassifiedPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Automating Predictive Phage Therapy Pharmacology.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suchet AggarwalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
Anjali DhallDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
Sumeet PatiyalDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
Shubham ChoudhuryDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
Akanksha AroraDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
Gajendra P S RaghavaDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, New Delhi, India.
Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage therapy is a viable alternative to antibiotics for treating microbial infections, particularly managing drug-resistant strains of bacteria. One of the major challenges in designing phage-based therapy is to identify the most appropriate potential phage candidate to treat bacterial infections. In this study, an attempt has been made to predict phage-host interactions with high accuracy to identify the potential bacteriophage that can be used for treating a bacterial infection. The developed models have been created using a training dataset containing 826 phage- host interactions, and have been evaluated on a validation dataset comprising 1,201 phage-host interactions. Firstly, alignment-based models have been developed using similarity between phage-phage (BLASTPhage), host-host (BLASTHost) and phage-CRISPR (CRISPRPred), where we achieved accuracy between 42.4-66.2% for BLASTPhage, 55-78.4% for BLASTHost, and 43.7-80.2% for CRISPRPred across five taxonomic levels. Secondly, alignment free models have been developed using machine learning techniques. Thirdly, hybrid models have been developed by integrating the alignment-free models and the similarity-scores where we achieved maximum performance of (60.6-93.5%). Finally, an ensemble model has been developed that combines the hybrid and alignment-based models. Our ensemble model achieved highest accuracy of 67.9, 80.6, 85.5, 90, and 93.5% at Genus, Family, Order, Class, and Phylum levels on validation dataset. In order to serve the scientific community, we have also developed a webserver named PhageTB and provided a standalone software package (https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/phagetb/) for the same.

Indexed as

bacterial infectionensemble methodphage-host interactionpredictiontaxonomic levels

Identifiers

PMID37032893
PMCPMC10076811
OpenAlexW4360618759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.