Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37032865›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Artificial intelligence-aided rapid and accurate identification of clinical fungal infections by single-cell Raman spectroscopy.

Jiabao Xu, Yanjun Luo, Jingkai Wang, Weiming Tu, Xiaofei Yi, Xiaogang Xu, Yizhi Song, Yuguo Tang, Xiaoting Hua, Yunsong Yu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review of the Microbial Spectrum of Mixed Respiratory Fungal Infections.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiabao XuDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yanjun LuoShanghai Hesen Biotech Co., Shanghai, China.
Jingkai WangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Weiming TuDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Xiaofei YiInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaogang XuInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yizhi SongSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Yuguo TangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Xiaoting HuaSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yunsong YuSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Huabing YinJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Qiwen YangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wei E HuangDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBChinese Academy of Sciences · CNFudan University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology · CNUniversity of Glasgow · GBZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating artificial intelligence and new diagnostic platforms into routine clinical microbiology laboratory procedures has grown increasingly intriguing, holding promises of reducing turnaround time and cost and maximizing efficiency. At least one billion people are suffering from fungal infections, leading to over 1.6 million mortality every year. Despite the increasing demand for fungal diagnosis, current approaches suffer from manual bias, long cultivation time (from days to months), and low sensitivity (only 50% produce positive fungal cultures). Delayed and inaccurate treatments consequently lead to higher hospital costs, mobility and mortality rates. Here, we developed single-cell Raman spectroscopy and artificial intelligence to achieve rapid identification of infectious fungi. The classification between fungi and bacteria infections was initially achieved with 100% sensitivity and specificity using single-cell Raman spectra (SCRS). Then, we constructed a Raman dataset from clinical fungal isolates obtained from 94 patients, consisting of 115,129 SCRS. By training a classification model with an optimized clinical feedback loop, just 5 cells per patient (acquisition time 2 s per cell) made the most accurate classification. This protocol has achieved 100% accuracies for fungal identification at the species level. This protocol was transformed to assessing clinical samples of urinary tract infection, obtaining the correct diagnosis from raw sample-to-result within 1 h.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical diagnosisfungal diagnosisRaman spectoscopysingle cell

Identifiers

PMID37032865
PMCPMC10073597
OpenAlexW4353085454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.