ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2023
Successful experiences and feasible techniques of robotic-assisted inferior vena cava filter retrieval after failure of endovascular attempts: a case report.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful retrieval of a vena cava filter in a patient with duodenal perforation by open surgery: a case report and literature review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters after failed or anticipated technically challenging endovascular retrieval: a retrospective case series of 28 patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: A Clinical Perspective.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
- Robot-assisted vascular surgery: literature review, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The mainstay of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval has been snare techniques. However, caval penetration or filter fracture makes endovascular approaches challenging, which in turn leads to more aggressive attempts, including open surgical procedures. The fact that laparoscopic approaches (especially the da Vinci robotic system) with minimal invasion allow for equivalent long-term outcomes as compared with open procedures is encouraging. To date, few centers have attempted secondary minimal invasive operation after filter retrieval failure. In this study, we presented a case of robot-assisted filter retrieval after failure of snare techniques. The operative time was 55 minutes, which was the shortest time reported in the collected studies thus far. Case Description: A 27-year-old female was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis after delivery and placement of an IVC filter. Local surgeons tried endovascular approaches to retrieve the filter, but failed twice. She was then transferred to our hospital and computed tomography venography revealed that the filter struts had protruded outside the cava wall. Based on our previous experiences of robotic surgery with vena cava graft replacement, we decided to perform robotic-assisted filter retrieval. The operation was successful, and the estimated blood loss was less than 50 mL. The patient was discharged 5 days after the operation and presented for reexamination 6 months later. Ultrasound showed that the IVC blood flow was smooth. No complications occurred, and the renal function was nearly normal. Conclusions: Filter retrieval failure through the endovascular approach is challenging, and occasionally, open surgery is needed as a second attempt. With the advancement of laparoscopic approaches, especially the enhanced ergonomics of the robotic system, aggressive operation can be avoided, and robotic-assisted filter retrieval can offer an alternative for surgeons to manage these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.