Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37032556›Full record

ArticleJournal of interpersonal violence2023

Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level.

Janet L Fanslow, Brooklyn M Mellar, Pauline J Gulliver, Tracey K D McIntosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interpersonal violence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 'Atawhai': a primary care provider-led response to family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  11. The Role of Positivity on Depressive Symptoms in Women Seeking Help for Intimate Partner Violence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janet L FanslowSocial and Community Health, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6511-0655
Brooklyn M MellarSocial and Community Health, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-6290
Pauline J GulliverSocial and Community Health, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Tracey K D McIntoshSchool of Māori Studies and Pacific Studies, Faculty of Arts, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Claims of "gender symmetry" in intimate partner violence (IPV) prevalence are contested, with resolution of the issue complicated by methodological and measurement challenges. This study explores gendered differences in the distribution of IPV exposure at the population-level, considering multiple types of IPV exposure. The subjects comprised of 1,431 ever-partnered women and 1,355 ever-partnered men. Data from a nationally representative population-based cross-sectional survey were used to compare men and women's IPV experiences. Twenty-three IPV acts were assessed across IPV types (moderate physical, severe physical, sexual, psychological, controlling behaviors, economic). Proportions were presented by gender for the number of individual IPV acts experienced per IPV type, and the frequency of these acts (none, once, few times, or many times). A composite exposure score was developed to assess the number of acts and their frequency within types by comparing scores in tertiles and across types by correlations. Women reported greater overall prevalence of 20 of the 23 individual IPV acts assessed. Across all assessed acts, women comprised a substantially greater proportion of those who reported experiencing individual acts "many times." Women experienced more severe and more frequent IPV than men based on self-reported experience of IPV acts, and by the frequency with which acts were experienced. Significant differences between men and women's exposure scores were observed for all six assessed types, with greater proportions of women scoring in the upper tertiles. This study provides evidence of gender asymmetry in experiences of IPV at the population level. While men do experience IPV victimization, there remains need for directed and substantial resource allocation for intervention and therapeutic responses to women's exposure to IPV, and for primary prevention with men. Going forward, IPV measurement tools that consider frequency, severity, or co-occurring types of IPV are needed.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsIntimate Partner ViolenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsSelf ReportSexual Partnersgendergender asymmetrygender symmetryintimate partner violencemeasurementpopulation-based survey

Identifiers

PMID37032556
PMCPMC10668541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.