Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37032535›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Instrument.

Hamid Sharif-Nia, Nasrin Hanifi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hamid Sharif-NiaPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5570-3710
Nasrin HanifiZanjan Nursing and Midwifery School, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (ZUMS), Zanjan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2480-214X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study was designed to characterize the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Instrument (P-SVEST).

designThis study was a methodological and cross-sectional study.

methodsThe SVEST was back-translated into Persian and 10 experts assessed its content validity. Construct validity was determined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with a total of 754 critical care and emergency nurses.

resultsThe results of exploratory factor analysis showed that the P-SVEST had four factors. These four factors accounted for 51.67% of the total variance. Also, these factors were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (root mean square error of approximation = (90%. confidence interval) = 0.058 [0.045, 0.071], goodness-of-fit index = 0.932, comparative fit index = 0.956, non-normal fit index = 0.918, incremental fit index = 0.957 and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.944). Coefficients of Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, composite reliability and maximum reliability for all of the factors were >0.7, demonstrating satisfied internal consistency.

Indexed as

TranslatingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesIranmedical errorsreliabilitysecond victimvalidity

Identifiers

PMID37032535
PMCPMC10277394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.