Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37032417›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023

Evaluation of techniques to improve a deep learning algorithm for the automatic detection of intracranial haemorrhage on CT head imaging.

Melissa Yeo, Bahman Tahayori, Hong Kuan Kok, Julian Maingard, Numan Kutaiba, Jeremy Russell, Vincent Thijs, Ashu Jhamb, Ronil V Chandra, Mark Brooks and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Melissa YeoMelbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. melissayeoxw@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5568-7303
Bahman TahayoriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Hong Kuan KokInterventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Northern Health, Epping, VIC, Australia.
Julian MaingardSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Numan KutaibaDepartment of Radiology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jeremy RussellDepartment of Neurosurgery, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Vincent ThijsStroke Theme, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ashu JhambDepartment of Radiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ronil V ChandraInterventional Neuroradiology Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Mark BrooksMelbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Christen D BarrasSouth Australian Institute of Health and Medical Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Hamed AsadiMelbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning (DL) algorithms are playing an increasing role in automatic medical image analysis. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a DL model for the automatic detection of intracranial haemorrhage and its subtypes on non-contrast CT (NCCT) head studies and to compare the effects of various preprocessing and model design implementations.

methodsThe DL algorithm was trained and externally validated on open-source, multi-centre retrospective data containing radiologist-annotated NCCT head studies. The training dataset was sourced from four research institutions across Canada, the USA and Brazil. The test dataset was sourced from a research centre in India. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was used, with its performance compared against similar models with additional implementations: (1) a recurrent neural network (RNN) attached to the CNN, (2) preprocessed CT image-windowed inputs and (3) preprocessed CT image-concatenated inputs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and microaveraged precision (mAP) score were used to evaluate and compare model performances.

resultsThe training and test datasets contained 21,744 and 491 NCCT head studies, respectively, with 8,882 (40.8%) and 205 (41.8%) positive for intracranial haemorrhage. Implementation of preprocessing techniques and the CNN-RNN framework increased mAP from 0.77 to 0.93 and increased AUC-ROC [95% confidence intervals] from 0.854 [0.816-0.889] to 0.966 [0.951-0.980] (p-value = 3.91 × 10

conclusionsThe deep learning model accurately detected intracranial haemorrhage and improved in performance following specific implementation techniques, demonstrating clinical potential as a decision support tool and an automated system to improve radiologist workflow efficiency. KEY POINTS: • The deep learning model detected intracranial haemorrhages on computed tomography with high accuracy. • Image preprocessing, such as windowing, plays a large role in improving deep learning model performance. • Implementations which enable an analysis of interslice dependencies can improve deep learning model performance. • Visual saliency maps can facilitate explainable artificial intelligence systems. • Deep learning within a triage system may expedite earlier intracranial haemorrhage detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceDeep learningIntracranial haemorrhagesRadiographic image interpretation (computer-assisted)Tomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID37032417
PMCPMC10083149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.