ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023
Evaluation of techniques to improve a deep learning algorithm for the automatic detection of intracranial haemorrhage on CT head imaging.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A non-invasive intracranial hemorrhage detection system based on electromagnetic induction.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Towards Explainability in Deep Learning for Detection of Five Major Intracranial Hemorrhage Subtypes on Head CT Using Multi-window DICOM Imaging and Patient-Level Cross-Validation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Robust slice-level stroke classification in non-contrast head CT via structural consistency regularization and counterfactual suppression.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Deep learning for intracranial hemorrhage detection and classification in brain CT scans: a systematic review and hybrid model approach.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Interpretable Multiomics Models for Predicting Surgical Interventions and Blood Transfusion Requirements in Traumatic Brain Injury.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing stroke risk prediction through class balancing and data augmentation with CBDA-ResNet50.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection in Non-Contrast Brain CT Scans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Explainable deep learning algorithm for identifying cerebral venous sinus thrombosis-related hemorrhage (CVST-ICH) from spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using computed tomography.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance and clinical applications of artificial intelligence for intracranial bleeding detection: A meta-analysis.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Clinical Impact of an AI Decision Support System for Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage in CT Scans.Neurotrauma reports · 2024Article
- Integrative Approaches in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Symptom Recognition to Future Innovations.Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning (DL) algorithms are playing an increasing role in automatic medical image analysis. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a DL model for the automatic detection of intracranial haemorrhage and its subtypes on non-contrast CT (NCCT) head studies and to compare the effects of various preprocessing and model design implementations.
methodsThe DL algorithm was trained and externally validated on open-source, multi-centre retrospective data containing radiologist-annotated NCCT head studies. The training dataset was sourced from four research institutions across Canada, the USA and Brazil. The test dataset was sourced from a research centre in India. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was used, with its performance compared against similar models with additional implementations: (1) a recurrent neural network (RNN) attached to the CNN, (2) preprocessed CT image-windowed inputs and (3) preprocessed CT image-concatenated inputs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and microaveraged precision (mAP) score were used to evaluate and compare model performances.
resultsThe training and test datasets contained 21,744 and 491 NCCT head studies, respectively, with 8,882 (40.8%) and 205 (41.8%) positive for intracranial haemorrhage. Implementation of preprocessing techniques and the CNN-RNN framework increased mAP from 0.77 to 0.93 and increased AUC-ROC [95% confidence intervals] from 0.854 [0.816-0.889] to 0.966 [0.951-0.980] (p-value = 3.91 × 10
conclusionsThe deep learning model accurately detected intracranial haemorrhage and improved in performance following specific implementation techniques, demonstrating clinical potential as a decision support tool and an automated system to improve radiologist workflow efficiency. KEY POINTS: • The deep learning model detected intracranial haemorrhages on computed tomography with high accuracy. • Image preprocessing, such as windowing, plays a large role in improving deep learning model performance. • Implementations which enable an analysis of interslice dependencies can improve deep learning model performance. • Visual saliency maps can facilitate explainable artificial intelligence systems. • Deep learning within a triage system may expedite earlier intracranial haemorrhage detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.