ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2023
Comparative analysis between STANDARD-E Covi-FERON ELISA with pre-existing IFN-γ release assays and determination of the optimum cutoff value for assessment of T-Cell response to SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses Following Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Prospective Cohort Study.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Whole-Blood Cellular Responses: A Promising Indicator of SARS-CoV-2 Immunity Compared to Serology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Improving the diagnostic performance for prior COVID-19 with T-SPOT, an interferon-gamma release assay.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis between STANDARD-E Covi-FERON ELISA with pre-existing IFN-γ release assays and determination of the optimum cutoff value for assessment of T-Cell response to SARS-CoV-2.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInterferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs) are useful for the assessment of the T-cell response to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). We aimed to assess the performance of the newly developed IGRA ELISA test compared to the pre-existing assays and to validate the cutoff value in real-world conditions.
methodsWe enrolled 219 participants and assessed agreement between STANDARD-E Covi-FERON ELISA with Quanti-FERON SARS-CoV-2 (QFN SARS-CoV-2), as well as with T SPOT Discovery SARS-CoV-2 based on Cohen's kappa-index. We further determined the optimal cutoff value for the Covi-FERON ELISA according to the immune response to vaccinations or infections.
resultsWe found a moderate agreement between Covi-FERON ELISA and QFN SARS-CoV-2 before vaccination (kappa-index = 0.71), whereas a weak agreement after the first (kappa-index = 0.40) and second vaccinations (kappa-index = 0.46). However, the analysis between Covi-FERON ELISA and T SPOT assay demonstrated a strong agreement (kappa-index >0.7). The cut-off value of the OS (original spike) marker was 0.759 IU/mL with a sensitivity of 96.3% and specificity of 78.7%, and that of the variant spike (VS) marker was 0.663 IU/mL with a sensitivity and specificity of 77.8% and 80.6%, respectively.
conclusionThe newly determined cut-off value may provide an optimum value to minimize and prevent the occurrence of false-negative or false-positive during the assessment of T-cell immune response using Covi-FERON ELISA under real-world conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.