ArticleGait & posture2023
Age-related differences in reactive balance control and fall-risk in people with chronic stroke.
Article in Gait & posture, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical effects of acupuncture treatment for prevention of insomnia-induced stroke: A large-scale cohort study.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2025Article
- Functional electrical stimulation to enhance reactive balance among people with hemiparetic stroke.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Effect of Aging and Cortical Stroke on Motor Adaptation to Overground Gait-Slips: Quantifying Differences in Adaptation Rate and Adaptation Plateau.Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Feasibility of challenging treadmill speed-dependent gait and perturbation-induced balance training in chronic stroke patients with low ambulation ability: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImpaired reactive responses to sudden environmental perturbations contribute to heightened fall-risk in healthy aging and neurologically impaired populations. Previous studies have demonstrated individual contributions of paretic and non-paretic sides to fall-risk in people with stroke with variable levels of motor impairment. However, the combined effect of aging and unilateral cortical lesion on reactive balance control is not clearly understood. We therefore aimed to examine age-related differences in reactive balance control and fall-risk during laboratory-induced gait-slips in people with comparable stroke-related motor impairments.
methodsThirteen younger (45.61 ± 4.61 years) and thirteen older (71.92 ± 6.50 years) adults with similar stroke-related impairment (on Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment) were exposed to one overground gait-slip under each limb (paretic and non-paretic). Center of mass state stability and slipping kinematics (slip displacement and velocity) were computed. Clinical balance and mobility were also assessed.
resultsOn non-paretic slips, older adults with chronic stroke demonstrated greater falls and lower center of mass stability (its position and velocity) at post-slip touchdown compared to younger adults with chronic stroke (p < 0.01). This was accompanied with a greater peak slip displacement and faster peak slip velocity (p < 0.01). However, there were no such group differences noted on the paretic slips (p > 0.01).
conclusionAging may have an independent, detrimental effect on reactive balance control in people with chronic stroke. Non-paretic deficits in controlling slip intensities (slip displacement and velocity) can accentuate fall-risk in older adults with chronic stroke. Further investigation is necessary to identify additional factors attributing to heightened fall-risk in older adults with chronic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.