Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37031462›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Anti-CLL1-based CAR T-cells with 4-1-BB or CD28/CD27 stimulatory domains in treating childhood refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.

Kunlin Pei, Haoyu Xu, Pengfei Wang, Wening Gan, Zhengbin Hu, Xiaoling Su, Hui Zhang, Yingyi He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pediatric AML CAR T cell therapy.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Phase 1 Study of KITE-222, an Autologous CLL-1-Directed CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy in leukemias.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026
    Review
  12. Have CARs stalled for non-B-cell malignancies? Where are we, and where are we going?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. CAR-T cell therapy for cancer: current challenges and future directions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  16. CAR-T cell therapy for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, advances and outcomes.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kunlin PeiDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.
Haoyu XuDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.
Pengfei WangDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.
Wening GanDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.
Zhengbin HuDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoling SuDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.
Hui ZhangDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8791-5753
Yingyi HeDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5479-2099
Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThough the efficacy of anti C-type lectin-like molecule-1 (CLL1) CAR T-cells in refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (R/R-AML) have been occasionally reported, the influence of co-stimulatory domain CAR T-cells is not investigated so far.

methodSeven R/R-AML children treated with anti-CLL1 CAR T-cells were enrolled onto this preliminary comparison study. Among these seven patients, four received CD28/CD27-based CAR T-cells therapy, and three received 4-1BB-based CAR T-cells therapy.

resultThe overall response rates were 75% and 66.7% in CD28/CD27 and 4-1BB group respectively. All patients experienced grade 1 to 2 cytokine release syndrome, with only one patient experiencing grade 2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. The maximum CAR T-cells durations were 156 and 274 days for CD28/CD27 group and 4-1BB group respectively. The 1-yr overall survival rate was 57.1%.

conclusionsA preliminary similar efficacy/safety index was observed in anti-CLL1-based CAR T-cells with 4-1BB or CD28/CD27 co-stimulatory elements in treating pediatric R/R-AML.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyeloproliferative DisordersCD28 AntigensChildHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeurotoxicity SyndromesT-LymphocytesCD28 Antigenscell-associated neurotoxicity4-1-BBacute myeloid leukemiaanti-CLL1 CAR T cellsCD28/CD27refractory/relapsed

Identifiers

PMID37031462
PMCPMC10166968
OpenAlexW4362729058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.