Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37031347›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2023

Implementation strategies preferred by primary care clinicians to facilitate cancer prevention and control activities.

Russell E Glasgow, Michaela Brtnikova, L Miriam Dickinson, Jennifer K Carroll, Jamie L Studts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Validation of the Observational Assessment Tool for Tailoring (OATT).Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Russell E GlasgowDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1844 Kona St. Eugene, Aurora, CO, OR 97403-2142, USA. russell.glasgow@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4218-3231
Michaela BrtnikovaAdult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
L Miriam DickinsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1844 Kona St. Eugene, Aurora, CO, OR 97403-2142, USA.
Jennifer K CarrollDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1844 Kona St. Eugene, Aurora, CO, OR 97403-2142, USA.
Jamie L StudtsDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Children's Hospital Colorado · USAmerican Academy of Family Physicians · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Pragmatic Implementation Science Approaches to Assess and Enhance Value of Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Primary CareP50CA244688 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GLASGOW, RUSSELL E · 2019 to 2023
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Key clinical and community members need to be involved in the identification of feasible and impactful implementation strategies for translation of evidence-based interventions into practice. While a wide range of implementation strategies has been developed, there is little research on their applicability for cancer prevention and control (CPC) efforts in primary care. We conducted a survey of primary care physicians to identify implementation strategies they perceive as most feasible and impactful. The survey included both primary prevention behavior change counseling and cancer screening issues. Analyses contrasted ratings of feasibility and impact of nine implementation strategies, and among clinicians in different settings with a focus on comparisons between clinicians in rural vs. non-rural settings. We recruited a convenience sample of 326 respondents from a wide range of practice types from four practice-based research networks in 49 states and including 177 clinicians in rural settings. Ratings of impact were somewhat higher than those for feasibility. Few of the nine implementation strategies were high on both impact and feasibility. Only 'adapting to my practice' was rated higher than a 4 ("moderate") on both impact and feasibility. There were relatively few differences between rural and non-rural clinicians or associated with other clinician or setting characteristics. There is considerable variability in perceived impact and feasibility of implementation strategies for CPC activities among family medicine clinicians. It is important to assess both feasibility and impact of implementation strategies as well as their generalizability across settings. Our results suggest that optimal strategies to implement evidence-based CPC activities will likely need to be adapted for primary care settings. Future research is needed to replicate these findings and identify practical, implementation partner informed implementation strategies.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPrimary Health CareHumansCancer prevention and controlContextEngagementImplementation strategiesPrimary carePrimary prevention

Identifiers

PMID37031347
PMCPMC10098247
OpenAlexW4362716394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.