Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37031332›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2023

Complications of conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation of traumatic pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Osama Z Alzobi, Yahya Alborno, Ahmad Toubasi, Jawad Derbas, Hammam Kayali, Hazem Nasef, Ashraf T Hantouly, Aiman Mudawi, Shady Mahmoud, Ghalib Ahmed

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Iatrogenic nerve injury following pelvic ring injury: a network meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Evaluation of preoperative screw planning and X-ray simulation for iliosacral and transsacral screw placement.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Novel 3D-navigated screw corridors for posterior pelvic ring stabilization: a finite element analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Navigation and intraoperative imaging in pelvic and acetabular trauma.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Comparison of spinopelvic fixation and iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  9. Efficacy and outcomes of rescue screws in unstable pelvic ring injuries - A retrospective matched cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Osama Z AlzobiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Yahya AlbornoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ahmad ToubasiFaculty of Medicine, the University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Jawad DerbasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Hammam KayaliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Hazem NasefDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ashraf T HantoulyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Aiman MudawiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Shady MahmoudDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ghalib AhmedDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. ghaliboudah@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4326-7250
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this review was to present a thorough overview of the complications associated with conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation to identify areas for improvement in surgical technique and patient selection.

methodsPubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for original human studies reporting on complications of conventional percutaneous sacroiliac fixation in traumatic pelvic ring injuries from January 1, 2000, to April 30, 2022. The main meta-analysis was based on the random effect model to pool all complications reported in the included studies. The results were reported as weighted proportions with 95% confidence intervals. This review was conducted in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

resultsA total of 56 studies with 3644 screws (2871 procedures) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 40.5 years. The most frequently reported complications were screw malposition with a weighted proportion of 6% (95% CI: 5-9%) and involved 189 out of 3644 screws, persistent pain following the procedure with a weighted proportion of 3% (95% CI: 2-4%) and affected 98 out of 2871 patients, and nerve injury, which had a weighted proportion of 2% (95% CI: 1-3%) and was observed in 41 out of 2871 procedures. The L5 and S1 nerve roots were more frequently affected. Revision surgery was required for 184 out of 2871 patients with a weighted proportion of 5% (95% CI: 3-7%). The primary reason for the revision was persistent pain after the initial procedure, which affected 74 out of 184 patients, with a weighted proportion of 2.0% (95% CI: 1.2-2.8%).

conclusionsThis study showed that screw malposition, the need for revision surgery, persistent pain, and nerve injuries were the most frequent complications following conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation. However, these results must be interpreted in context due to confounding factors, including the lack of high-quality studies and the absence of uniformity in defining some complications across studies.

Indexed as

Fractures, BonePelvic BonesAdultBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, InternalHumansPainRetrospective StudiesSacrumConventionalMeta-analysisPelvic ring injuriesSacroiliac screwSI screw

Identifiers

PMID37031332
OpenAlexW4362722194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.