Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37031302›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2023

Rehydration Post-orientation: Investigating Field-Induced Structural Changes via Computational Rehydration.

Maxim N Brodmerkel, Emiliano De Santis, Carl Caleman, Erik G Marklund

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maxim N BrodmerkelDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, Box 576, 75123, Uppsala, Sweden.
Emiliano De SantisDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, Box 576, 75123, Uppsala, Sweden.
Carl CalemanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, 75120, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erik G MarklundDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, Box 576, 75123, Uppsala, Sweden. erik.marklund@kemi.uu.se.
Uppsala University · SECenter for Free-Electron Laser Science · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins can be oriented in the gas phase using strong electric fields, which brings advantages for structure determination using X-ray free electron lasers. Both the vacuum conditions and the electric-field exposure risk damaging the protein structures. Here, we employ molecular dynamics simulations to rehydrate and relax vacuum and electric-field exposed proteins in aqueous solution, which simulates a refinement of structure models derived from oriented gas-phase proteins. We find that the impact of the strong electric fields on the protein structures is of minor importance after rehydration, compared to that of vacuum exposure and ionization in electrospraying. The structures did not fully relax back to their native structure in solution on the simulated timescales of 200 ns, but they recover several features, including native-like intra-protein contacts, which suggests that the structures remain in a state from which the fully native structure is accessible. Our findings imply that the electric fields used in native mass spectrometry are well below a destructive level, and suggest that structures inferred from X-ray diffraction from gas-phase proteins are relevant for solution and in vivo conditions, at least after in silico rehydration.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsMass SpectrometryX-Ray DiffractionProteinsElectric dipoleMolecular dynamics simulationProtein hydrationProtein structureStructural biologyX-rays

Identifiers

PMID37031302
PMCPMC10264475
OpenAlexW4362717694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.