Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37031277›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2023

Uncovering biology by single-cell proteomics.

M Shahid Mansuri, Kenneth Williams, Angus C Nairn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Single-Cell Proteomics Decodes the Cellular Response to Lysosomal Storage inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Integrating the analysis of human biopsies using post-translational modifications proteomics.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M Shahid MansuriYale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Center and Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kenneth WilliamsYale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Center and Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Angus C NairnYale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Center and Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. angus.nairn@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7075-0195

Funding

Yale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Research CenterP30DA018343 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ANGUS C. NAIRN, Kenneth Robert WILLIAMS · 2004 to 2026
$37.1M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA018343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances have opened the door to single-cell proteomics that can answer key biological questions regarding how protein expression, post-translational modifications, and protein interactions dictate cell state in health and disease.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomics

Identifiers

PMID37031277
PMCPMC10082756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.