Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37031196›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Predicting response to enzalutamide and abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer using whole-omics machine learning.

Anouk C de Jong, Alexandra Danyi, Job van Riet, Ronald de Wit, Martin Sjöström, Felix Feng, Jeroen de Ridder, Martijn P Lolkema

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Current Evidence on Cabazitaxel for Prostate Cancer Therapy: A Narrative Review.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anouk C de Jong *Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7381-3171
Alexandra Danyi *Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1857-0816
Job van RietDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7767-7923
Ronald de WitDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Martin SjöströmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2629-9966
Felix FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0963-7687
Jeroen de RidderCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0828-3477
Martijn P LolkemaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. m.lolkema@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0466-2928
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) varies widely in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To improve treatment guidance, biomarkers are needed. We use whole-genomics (WGS; n = 155) with matching whole-transcriptomics (WTS; n = 113) from biopsies of ARSI-treated mCRPC patients for unbiased discovery of biomarkers and development of machine learning-based prediction models. Tumor mutational burden (q < 0.001), structural variants (q < 0.05), tandem duplications (q < 0.05) and deletions (q < 0.05) are enriched in poor responders, coupled with distinct transcriptomic expression profiles. Validating various classification models predicting treatment duration with ARSI on our internal and external mCRPC cohort reveals two best-performing models, based on the combination of prior treatment information with either the four combined enriched genomic markers or with overall transcriptomic profiles. In conclusion, predictive models combining genomic, transcriptomic, and clinical data can predict response to ARSI in mCRPC patients and, with additional optimization and prospective validation, could improve treatment guidance.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAndrostenesBenzamidesBiomarkers, TumorHumansMaleNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinTreatment OutcomeabirateroneAndrostenesBenzamidesBiomarkers, TumorenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoin

Identifiers

PMID37031196
PMCPMC10082805
OpenAlexW4362720675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.