Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37031187›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Improving the generalizability of protein-ligand binding predictions with AI-Bind.

Ayan Chatterjee, Robin Walters, Zohair Shafi, Omair Shafi Ahmed, Michael Sebek, Deisy Gysi, Rose Yu, Tina Eliassi-Rad, Albert-László Barabási, Giulia Menichetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A linear interpretable model for drug target prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ayan ChatterjeeNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Robin WaltersKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Zohair ShafiKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6154-1466
Omair Shafi AhmedKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael SebekNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3347-7131
Deisy GysiNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Rose YuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Tina Eliassi-RadNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Albert-László BarabásiNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Giulia MenichettiNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA. giulia.menichetti@channing.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5201-6774

Funding

Systems Biology of Airway DiseaseP01HL132825 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WEISS, SCOTT T · 2016 to 2020
$12.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL132825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying novel drug-target interactions is a critical and rate-limiting step in drug discovery. While deep learning models have been proposed to accelerate the identification process, here we show that state-of-the-art models fail to generalize to novel (i.e., never-before-seen) structures. We unveil the mechanisms responsible for this shortcoming, demonstrating how models rely on shortcuts that leverage the topology of the protein-ligand bipartite network, rather than learning the node features. Here we introduce AI-Bind, a pipeline that combines network-based sampling strategies with unsupervised pre-training to improve binding predictions for novel proteins and ligands. We validate AI-Bind predictions via docking simulations and comparison with recent experimental evidence, and step up the process of interpreting machine learning prediction of protein-ligand binding by identifying potential active binding sites on the amino acid sequence. AI-Bind is a high-throughput approach to identify drug-target combinations with the potential of becoming a powerful tool in drug discovery.

Indexed as

ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesLigandsProtein BindingLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID37031187
PMCPMC10082765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.