ReviewParkinsonism & related disorders2023
Clinical trials for cognition in Parkinson's disease: Where are we and how can we do better?
Review in Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping the research landscape of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's disease: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- How to advance the pharmacological management of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- Glial-Dopamine crosstalk: Astrocytic and microglial gatekeepers of neuroinflammation, plasticity, and motivation.AIMS neuroscience · 2026Review
- Understanding barriers and facilitators to participation in Parkinson's research in Black communities in the UK.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Risk of impairment in cognitive instrumental activities of daily living for sexual and gender minority adults with reported Parkinson's disease.The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2025Article
- A Call for Change: Updating the Operational Definition for Dementia in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Sex Differences for Social Determinants Associated with Lewy Body Dementia Onset and Diagnosis.Neuro-degenerative diseases · 2025Article
- The Parkinson's Disease Composite of Executive Functioning: A Measure for Detecting Cognitive Decline in Clinical Trials.Neurology · 2024Article
- Can Continuous Levodopa Delivery Be Achieved in the Absence of Intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion? Implications for India and Underserved Countries.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Article
- Associations of Alzheimer's-related plasma biomarkers with cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and has a substantial impact on quality of life. Despite numerous trials targeting various PD features, we still lack effective treatments for cognition beyond cholinesterase inhibitors.
objectiveTo identify the gaps in recent clinical trials with cognitive outcomes in PD and consider areas for improvement.
methodsWe examined recent clinical trials with cognitive outcomes in PD registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, excluding trials without cognitive outcomes, non-interventional studies, and in atypical Parkinsonian disorders. Included trials were categorized by treatment approach (investigational medicinal product, behavioral, physical activity, device-based). Details of trial design and outcomes were collected.
results178 trials at different stages of trial completion were considered. 46 trials were completed, 25 had available results. Mean follow-up duration was 29.9 weeks. Most common cognitive measure was Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Most were performed in North America or Europe. Majority of the participants identified as non-Hispanic and White. Only eight trials showed improvement in cognition, none showed improvement beyond four months. These included trials of international medicinal products, cognitive and physical interventions and devices. GRADE certainty levels ranged from Moderate to Very Low. Only mevidalen had a Moderate certainty for potential clinical effectiveness.
conclusionsAmongst a large number of trials for cognition in PD, only a small proportion were completed. Few showed significant improvement, with no proven long-lasting effects. Trial design, lack of enrichment for at-risk groups, short follow-up duration, insensitive outcome measures likely contribute to lack of detectable benefit and should be considered in future trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.