Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37030675›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2023

Comparative Characterization of Nonlinear Ultrasound Fields Generated by Sonalleve V1 and V2 MR-HIFU Systems.

Maria M Karzova, Wayne Kreider, Ari Partanen, Tatiana D Khokhlova, Oleg A Sapozhnikov, Petr V Yuldashev, Vera A Khokhlova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. xDDx: A Numerical Toolbox for Ultrasound Transducer Characterization and Design With Acoustic Holography.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  2. MR Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound for Breast Tumors.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  3. Acoustically responsive scaffolds: Unraveling release kinetics and mechanisms for sustained, steady drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Histotripsy: A Method for Mechanical Tissue Ablation with Ultrasound.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. The histotripsy spectrum: differences and similarities in techniques and instrumentation.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria M Karzova
Wayne Kreider
Ari Partanen
Tatiana D Khokhlova
Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Petr V Yuldashev
Vera A Khokhlova

Funding

Nonlinear Acoustics in Calibration/Metrology of High Intensity Focused UltrasoundR01EB007643 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KHOKHLOVA, VERA · 2008 to 2020
$6.9M
Strategies in therapeutic ultrasound for predicting in situ fields and quantifying the impact of tissue inhomogeneitiesR01EB025187 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SAPOZHNIKOV, OLEG · 2018 to 2021
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007643NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Sonalleve magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) clinical system (Profound Medical, Mississauga, ON, Canada) has been shown to generate nonlinear ultrasound fields with shocks up to 100 MPa at the focus as required for HIFU applications such as boiling histotripsy of hepatic and renal tumors. The Sonalleve system has two versions V1 and V2 of the therapeutic array, with differences in focusing angle, focus depth, arrangement of elements, and the size of a central opening that is twice larger in the V2 system compared to the V1. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of the V1 and V2 transducers for generating high-amplitude shock-wave fields and to reveal the impact of different array geometries on shock amplitudes at the focus. Nonlinear modeling of the field in water using boundary conditions reconstructed from holography measurements shows that at the same power output, the V2 array generates 10-15-MPa lower shock amplitudes at the focus. Consequently, substantially higher power levels are required for the V2 system to reach the same shock-wave exposure conditions in histotripsy-type treatments. Although this difference is mainly caused by the smaller focusing angle of the V2 array, the larger central opening of the V2 array has a nontrivial impact. By excluding coherently interacting weakly focused waves coming from the central part of the source, the presence of the central opening results in a somewhat higher effective focusing angle and thus higher shock amplitudes at the focus. Axisymmetric equivalent source models were constructed for both arrays, and the importance of including the central opening was demonstrated. These models can be used in the "HIFU beam" software for simulating nonlinear fields of the Sonalleve V1 and V2 systems in water and flat-layered biological tissues.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationMagnetic Resonance ImagingLiverUltrasonographyWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID37030675
PMCPMC10280052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.