Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37030323›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2023

Identifying Nursing Home Residents with Unmet Palliative Care Needs: A Systematic Review of Screening Tool Measurement Properties.

Connie S Cole, Jessica Roydhouse, Regina M Fink, Mustafa Ozkaynak, Joan G Carpenter, Evan Plys, Shaowei Wan, Cari R Levy

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Nursing Home Palliative Care Referral Process, Barriers, and Proposed Solutions: A Qualitative Study.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Connie S ColeUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: connie.cole@cuanschutz.edu.
Jessica RoydhouseMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Regina M FinkUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado College of Nursing, Aurora, CO, USA.
Mustafa OzkaynakUniversity of Colorado College of Nursing, Aurora, CO, USA.
Joan G CarpenterUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Evan PlysMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Shaowei WanUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Cari R LevyUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Multidisciplinary Research Training in Palliative CareT32AG044296 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STACY M FISCHER, JEAN S KUTNER · 2014 to 2026
$3.3M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG044296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite common use of palliative care screening tools in other settings, the performance of these tools in the nursing home has not been well established; therefore, the purpose of this review is to (1) identify palliative care screening tools validated for nursing home residents and (2) critically appraise, compare, and summarize the quality of measurement properties.

designSystematic review of measurement properties consistent with Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. SETTINGS AND

participantsEmbase (Ovid), MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO), and PsycINFO (Ovid) were searched from inception to May 2022. Studies that (1) reported the development or evaluation of a palliative care screening tool and (2) sampled older adults living in a nursing home were included.

methodsTwo reviewers independently screened, selected, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias.

resultsWe identified only 1 palliative care screening tool meeting COSMIN criteria, the NECesidades Paliativas (NEC-PAL, equivalent to palliative needs in English), but evidence for use with nursing home residents was of low quality. The NEC-PAL lacked robust testing of measurement properties such as reliability, sensitivity, and specificity in the nursing home setting. Construct validity through hypothesis testing was adequate but only reported in 1 study. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence to guide practice. Broadening the criteria further, this review reports on 3 additional palliative care screening tools identified during the search and screening process but which were excluded during full-text review for various reasons. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Given the unique care environment of nursing homes, we recommend future studies to validate available tools and develop new instruments specifically designed for nursing home use. In the meantime, we recommend that clinicians consider the evidence presented here and choose a screening instrument that best meets their needs.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesPalliative CareAgedHumansReproducibility of ResultsSkilled Nursing Facilitieslong-term careNursing homepalliative carescreeningsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37030323
PMCPMC10156164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.