ArticleESMO open2023
Time to reimbursement of novel anticancer drugs in Europe: a case study of seven European countries.
Article in ESMO open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic treatment paradigms for unresectable and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Global disparities in the availability and reimbursement of systemic therapies for renal cell carcinoma: results of the International ARON-AID Survey.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Physicians' Perspectives on Access to Innovative Oncology Therapies: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Bulgaria.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer treatment: from molecular design to clinical implementation.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Challenges and Potential Solutions to Advance Global Cancer Drug Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Stakeholders' experiences with a clinician-led access programme linking evidence generation and reimbursement for precision cancer treatments: the drug access protocol in the Netherlands.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Reimbursement routes and past practices for advanced therapy medicinal products in the Netherlands.Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Access to anticancer and orphan medicines through compassionate use programs and named patient basis in seven European countries.ESMO open · 2025Article
- Survival analysis of time to reimbursement of novel medicines in five Eurasian countries.Global health research and policy · 2025Article
- Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Unveiled: Bridging Science, Treatment Strategy, and Economic Aspects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Introduction of Biopharmaceuticals in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study of Early Diffusion Patterns and Data Availability.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Article
- New systemic treatment paradigms in advanced biliary tract cancer and variations in patient access across Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
- Article
- Tearing down inequalities in the healthcare system across Europe: the BEACON project.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Delayed access to innovative medicines in Romania: a comprehensive analysis of the reimbursement processes (2015-2024).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Is Canada Moving towards a More Agile Regulatory Approval and Reimbursement Process with a Shifting Role for Real-World Evidence (RWE) for Oncology Drugs?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Early Access for Medicines in ITALY: The Case of Ruxolitinib for Patients with Graft-Versus-Host Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Availability and Access to Orphan Drugs for Rare Cancers in Bulgaria: Analysis of Delays and Public Expenditures.Cancers · 2024Article
- Demographic Analysis of Cancer Research Priorities and Treatment Correlations.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Access in all areas? A round up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 1.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTime to reimbursement (TTR) of new anticancer medicines differs between countries and contributes to unequal access. We aimed to investigate TTR of new anticancer medicines and explore factors influencing the reimbursement process in seven high-income European countries. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe carried out a retrospective case study of anticancer medicines with European Union Market Access (EU-MA) and a positive Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use opinion from 2016 until 2021 with subsequent national reimbursement approval (NRA). The National Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and reimbursement websites of Germany, France, UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway and Switzerland were used to identify TTR, defined as time from EU-MA to NRA. Additionally, we investigated medication-, country-, indication- and pharma-related factors potentially influencing TTR.
resultsThirty-five medicines were identified for which TTR ranged from -81 days to 2320 days (median 407 days). At data cut-off, 16 (46%) were reimbursed in all seven countries. Overall, the shortest TTR was in Germany (median 3 days, all medicines reimbursed <5 days). The time limit for reimbursement of 180 days stated by the Council of European Communities after the EU-MA (EU Transparency Directive) was met for 100% of included medicines in Germany, 51% in France, 29% in the UK and the Netherlands, 14% in Switzerland, 6% in Norway and 3% in Belgium. The TTR was significantly different between countries (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with shorter TTR were higher gross domestic product (GDP), absence of a pre-assessment procedure and submission by a big pharmaceutical company.
conclusionsTTR of anticancer medicines varies significantly between seven high-income European countries and leads to inequality in access. Among explored medication-, country-, indication- and pharma-related factors we found that a high GDP, the absence of a pre-assessment procedure and submission by big pharmaceutical companies were associated with shorter TTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.