Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37030101›Full record

ReviewAquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023

Recommendations for advancing media preparation methods used to assess aquatic hazards of oils and spill response agents.

Thomas Parkerton, Michel Boufadel, Trond Nordtug, Carys Mitchelmore, Kat Colvin, Dana Wetzel, Mace G Barron, Gail E Bragin, Benjamin de Jourdan, Jennifer Loughery

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Thomas ParkertonEnviSci Consulting, LLC, 5900 Balcones Dr, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78731, United States. Electronic address: tfparke@outlook.com.
Michel BoufadelCenter for Natural Resources, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 MLK Blvd., Newark, NJ, United States. Electronic address: boufadel@gmail.com.
Trond NordtugSINTEF Ocean AS, P.O. box 4762, Torgarden, Trondheim NO-7465, Norway. Electronic address: Trond.Nordtug@sintef.no.
Carys MitchelmoreUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, 146 Williams Street, Solomons, MD, United States. Electronic address: 20688mitchelm@umces.edu.
Kat ColvinCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kc444@exeter.ac.uk.
Dana WetzelEnvironmental Laboratory of Forensics, Mote Marine Laboratory, 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway, Sarasota, FL, United States. Electronic address: 34236dana@mote.org.
Mace G BarronOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561, United States. Electronic address: Barron.Mace@epa.gov.
Gail E BraginExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ 08801, United States. Electronic address: gail.e.bragin@exxonmobil.com.
Benjamin de JourdanHuntsman Marine Science Centre, 1 Lower Campus Rd, St. Andrews, St. Andrews, New Brunswick E5B 2L7, Canada. Electronic address: Benjamin.deJourdan@huntsmanmarine.ca.
Jennifer LougheryHuntsman Marine Science Centre, 1 Lower Campus Rd, St. Andrews, St. Andrews, New Brunswick E5B 2L7, Canada. Electronic address: jennifer.loughery@huntsmanmarine.ca.
Huntsman Marine Science Centre · CABalcones Technologies (United States) · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USExxonMobil (United States) · USMote Marine Laboratory · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · USSINTEF · NOUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory preparation of aqueous test media is a critical step in developing toxicity information needed for oil spill response decision-making. Multiple methods have been used to prepare physically and chemically dispersed oils which influence test outcome, interpretation, and utility for hazard assessment and modeling. This paper aims to review media preparation strategies, highlight advantages and limitations, provide recommendations for improvement, and promote the standardization of methods to better inform assessment and modeling. A benefit of media preparation methods for oil that rely on low to moderate mixing energy coupled with a variable dilution design is that the dissolved oil composition of the water accommodation fraction (WAF) stock is consistent across diluted treatments.  Further, analyses that support exposure confirmation maybe reduced and reflect dissolved oil exposures that are bioavailable and amenable to toxicity modeling.  Variable loading tests provide a range of dissolved oil compositions that require analytical verification at each oil loading. Regardless of test design, a preliminary study is recommended to optimize WAF mixing and settling times to achieve equilibrium between oil and test media. Variable dilution tests involving chemical dispersants (CEWAF) or high energy mixing (HEWAF) can increase dissolved oil exposures in treatment dilutions due to droplet dissolution when compared to WAFs. In contrast, HEWAF/CEWAFs generated using variable oil loadings are expected to provide dissolved oil exposures more comparable to WAFs. Preparation methods that provide droplet oil exposures should be environmentally relevant and informed by oil droplet concentrations, compositions, sizes, and exposure durations characteristic of field spill scenarios. Oil droplet generators and passive dosing techniques offer advantages for delivering controlled constant or dynamic dissolved exposures and larger volumes of test media for toxicity testing. Adoption of proposed guidance for improving media preparation methods will provide greater comparability and utility of toxicity testing in oil spill response and assessment.

Indexed as

PetroleumPetroleum PollutionPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalOilsWaterOilsPetroleumPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalMedia preparationOil toxicity testingPassive dosingWater accommodated fraction

Identifiers

PMID37030101
PMCPMC10519191
OpenAlexW4362575227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.