Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37029894›Full record

SynthesisMaternal and child health journal2023

Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Postpartum Depression: A Systematic Review.

N Valverde, E Mollejo, L Legarra, M Gómez-Gutiérrez

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Maternal and child health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Psychological support and postpartum depression in twin gestations: a prospective analysis using the Edinburgh Scale.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026
    Article
  4. Psychiatric Risk Factors for Postpartum Depression: A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N ValverdeFaculty of Psychology, Department of Assessment, Personality and Clinical Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Campus of Somosaguas s/n, Madrid, 28040, Spain. nvalverd@ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3311-4991
E MollejoDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Southeast University Hospital of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
L LegarraFaculty of Psychology, Department of Assessment, Personality and Clinical Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Campus of Somosaguas s/n, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
M Gómez-GutiérrezFaculty of Psychology, Department of Assessment, Personality and Clinical Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Campus of Somosaguas s/n, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPostpartum depression estimated prevalence in women is between 5 and 26% and it has adverse effects both on the mother, infant and her partner. Psychological treatments have proved to be effective for women with mild-to-moderate symptoms. Whereas several systematic reviews have assessed the effects of different psychological interventions for postpartum depression, such as cognitive-behavioural therapy or interpersonal therapy, no review assessing psychodynamic therapy has been carried out. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy for postpartum depression.

methodsStudies were identified using the following databases: PsycINFO, Psycarticles and Pubmed over January 2023. The requirements for the studies were the following: they had to be quantitative, available in English, including a psychodynamic intervention targeting treatment or prevention of postpartum depression which starts during pregnancy or within the first 12 months after giving birth. Case studies, qualitative studies or studies focused on improving parent-infant relationship or infant outcome were excluded from this research.

resultsSeven trials including 521 women met the inclusion criteria. In summary, three randomized controlled trials and four longitudinal studies were found. The most frequently used assessment tool was EPDS, five were individual interventions and the other two were group interventions. DISCUSSION: All studies reported the efficacy of psychodynamic interventions for postpartum depression, both in home and clinical settings and both in group and individual format. The limited number of trials, small sample sizes and lack of appropriate control groups were the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Psychodynamic therapy is probably efficient intervention for postpartum depression. Future research with strong methodological designs is needed to confirm these findings. SIGNIFICANCE: What is already known on this subject? Several systematic reviews have assessed the effects of different psychological interventions for postpartum depression, but no review assessing psychodynamic therapy has been carried out. What this study adds? A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy for postpartumdepression. This makes the systematic review a unique contribution to the literature.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepression, PostpartumPsychotherapy, PsychodynamicBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansInfantParturitionPregnancyPerinatal periodPostpartum depressionPsychodynamic therapySystematic reviewWomen’s mental health

Identifiers

PMID37029894
PMCPMC10232568
OpenAlexW4362716722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.