Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37029834›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2023

Relationship between the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale and physical function in the elderly people.

Saki Inanaga, Masaichi Hasegawa, Mizuho Kosuge, Shoichi Ichimura, Takeshi Morii, Naobumi Hosogane

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06300632 (Geriatric Locomotive Syndrome Kinesiophobia, Physical Activity Level, Physical Performance, Fatigue, Cognitive Functions in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06300632 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Geriatric Locomotive Syndrome Kinesiophobia, Physical Activity Level, Physical Performance, Fatigue, Cognitive Functions in Older Adults

TypeobservationalSponsorKırıkkale UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled97ConditionsLocomotive SyndromeArmsgeriatric locomotive syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saki InanagaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2, Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-6565
Masaichi HasegawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2, Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Mizuho KosugeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2, Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Shoichi IchimuraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2, Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Takeshi MoriiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2, Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Naobumi HosoganeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2, Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan. hosogane@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp.
Kyorin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLocomotive syndrome (LS) is a condition of reduced mobility. The LS stage can be determined by the stand-up test, two-step test, and 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale (GLFS-25). This study aimed to establish whether the LS stage can be reliably determined using the GLFS-25, and to clarify the correlation between the GLFS-25's six subcategories and physical functions. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe administered the GLFS-25 and evaluated physical functions using the stand-up test, the two-step test, handgrip strength, the five-times sit-to-stand test, the 4 m walking test, and the duration of single leg standing. We assessed 103 participants over 65 years of age. We analyzed the correlation between LS stage and GLFS-25 score, as well as the correlations between physical functions and the GLFS-25's six subcategories.

resultsThere was a discrepancy between the LS stage determined using the GLFS-25 alone and the LS stage determined using all three tools. ROC analysis revealed a cut-off value of 6 for the discrimination of LS stages 0/1 and 14 for stages 1/2. The analysis revealed an AUC of 0.78 and 0.81, respectively. Among the six subcategories of the GLFS-25, movement-related difficulty, usual care, ADL, and social activities were correlated with mobility functions. In contrast, body pain and cognitive showed no correlation.

conclusionThe GLFS-25 is useful for screening those with severe LS stages; however, evaluation of actual physical function is recommended for precise staging of LS in those with low GFLS-25 scores. Among the six subcategories of the GLFS-25, body pain and cognitive were independent of the other four subcategories.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthLocomotionAgedHumansPainROC CurveSyndrome25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25)Locomotive syndromePhysical function

Identifiers

PMID37029834
OpenAlexW4362716910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.