ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2023
Relationship between the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale and physical function in the elderly people.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06300632 (Geriatric Locomotive Syndrome Kinesiophobia, Physical Activity Level, Physical Performance, Fatigue, Cognitive Functions in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Geriatric Locomotive Syndrome Kinesiophobia, Physical Activity Level, Physical Performance, Fatigue, Cognitive Functions in Older Adults
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale Assessment of Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Older Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients with Locomotive Syndrome Stage Three: Comparing Stage-Based and Minimal Clinically Important Difference-Based Improvements.Spine surgery and related research · 2026Article
- Differences in Item Discrimination of the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale Between Younger and Middle-Aged Adults and Older Adults: An Analysis Using the Item Response Theory.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Article
- Subjective slow walking speed is associated with locomotive syndrome severity in 34,935 adults undergoing medical checkups.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessment of Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Using the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale: A Longitudinal Observational Study.Spine surgery and related research · 2024Article
- Development of the assessment standards of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Geriatric Core Set through a modified Delphi method.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Locomotive Syndrome and Related Factors in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study From Türkiye.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLocomotive syndrome (LS) is a condition of reduced mobility. The LS stage can be determined by the stand-up test, two-step test, and 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale (GLFS-25). This study aimed to establish whether the LS stage can be reliably determined using the GLFS-25, and to clarify the correlation between the GLFS-25's six subcategories and physical functions. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe administered the GLFS-25 and evaluated physical functions using the stand-up test, the two-step test, handgrip strength, the five-times sit-to-stand test, the 4 m walking test, and the duration of single leg standing. We assessed 103 participants over 65 years of age. We analyzed the correlation between LS stage and GLFS-25 score, as well as the correlations between physical functions and the GLFS-25's six subcategories.
resultsThere was a discrepancy between the LS stage determined using the GLFS-25 alone and the LS stage determined using all three tools. ROC analysis revealed a cut-off value of 6 for the discrimination of LS stages 0/1 and 14 for stages 1/2. The analysis revealed an AUC of 0.78 and 0.81, respectively. Among the six subcategories of the GLFS-25, movement-related difficulty, usual care, ADL, and social activities were correlated with mobility functions. In contrast, body pain and cognitive showed no correlation.
conclusionThe GLFS-25 is useful for screening those with severe LS stages; however, evaluation of actual physical function is recommended for precise staging of LS in those with low GFLS-25 scores. Among the six subcategories of the GLFS-25, body pain and cognitive were independent of the other four subcategories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.