ArticleUrolithiasis2023
Value of detected hydronephrosis and hydroureter on ultrasound for detecting a ureteral stone: a retrospective study.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasonography in pediatric urinary stone diagnosis: clinical utility and diagnostic limitations in light of CT findings.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Imaging diagnosis and treatment of retrocaval ureter in children: clinical analysis of five cases.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the predictive value of hydronephrosis and hydroureter in the detection of ureteral stones using ultrasound, a total of 366 patients suffering from ureteral stones confirmed by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and their follow-up treatments were consecutively collected. All the included patients underwent systematic ultrasound scanning of the kidney and ureter. The hydronephrosis and hydroureter in each patient were measured using a digital caliper. Then, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff values for hydronephrosis and hydroureter to predict a ureteral stone's location and size. The hydronephrosis, hydroureter, and stone size measurements showed good interobserver agreement (P < 0.001). Using the lower border of the sacroiliac joint as a demarcation point, we found larger widths of hydronephrosis and hydroureter in the proximal ureteral stone group than in the distal ureteral stone group (P < 0.001). Additionally, 10.9 mm and 5.9 mm were identified as optimal cutoff values for predicting a distal position (P < 0.001), with no significant difference in their predictive value (P > 0.05). Similar comparisons between groups based on size stratification revealed no significant difference in hydronephrosis between the > 5 mm group and the ≤ 5 mm group. However, the hydroureter was larger in the > 5 mm group than in the ≤ 5 mm group after identifying 6 mm as the best cutoff (P =0.004). In summary, the ultrasound measurement of hydronephrosis and hydroureter may predict the position and size of a possible ureteral stone in patients with colic symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37029823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.